- Sat Nov 15, 2025 1:22 pm
#100059
https://www.ft.com/content/db771f1c-701 ... dfe6386b9e
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/db771f1c-701 ... dfe6386b9e
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Thu Nov 13, 2025 12:16 pmMore on this here from the FT.Killer Whale wrote: ↑Thu Nov 13, 2025 11:19 am I've always thought it a bit weird that we're subsidising people to keep bikes in their sheds. As someone who has cycled to work since the early 90s, I've never had to take advantage of the scheme. But I know many people who have got free money and used it to buy bikes that only ever come out for a gentle spin at the weekend.It's surprising it lasted so long. My brother in law used it. I'm pretty sure he never cycled to work.
A legacy of the pre-banking crisis days when it seemed we had public money to burn.
The cap used to be £1,000 but seems to have been abolished 6 years ago, as far as I can tell. Perhaps some London based Tory Spad argued very strongly for it, and they certainly need policies that people who went to university with him/her might like.
Subsidizing.a health activity isn't the worst idea, but there should be a limit on it. Seeing as we can barely afford to run a youth club in most areas.
https://www.ft.com/content/db771f1c-701 ... dfe6386b9e
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/db771f1c-701 ... dfe6386b9e
In the arch under London Bridge station that houses his electric bike business, Fully Charged, Dan Parsons looked around at the stock and said he was worried about the upcoming Budget.According to Rob Ford, this counts as hippy punching.
Under plans first reported by the Financial Times on Thursday, chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to impose a cap on the maximum value of a bike that can be purchased under the cycle-to-work scheme, first launched in 1999. The scheme allows people to pay for bikes on a “salary sacrifice” basis — out of their pre-tax income — saving 42 per cent of the cost for a higher-rate taxpayer.
Parsons expressed frustration that his sales could be affected by a measure intended to curb the sale of “luxury leisure” high-end performance bikes through the taxpayer-funded scheme. Machines such as the Riese & Müller Load 75 — a cargo bike starting from £8,729 — or the Urban Arrow Active Family Plus — from £4,999 — allowed families to replace cars as a way of ferrying their children around, Parsons insisted.
They are examples of a new breed of cargo bikes, mainly supplied by continental European manufacturers, designed to let parents carry children safely and comfortably.
“I was probably wrongly excited when the Labour government came in because I thought they would be more supportive of small businesses and cycling and walking,” Parsons said.

- By satnav