User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#100970
The Weeping Angel wrote: Thu Nov 27, 2025 10:49 pm Ok, can I apply this to your posts, Malcolm?
Don’t patronise me. I’ve been doing source evaluation since before you were born. Also, I don’t post random shit without explanation or provenance.
User avatar
By Killer Whale
#100975
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Nov 28, 2025 1:04 am
Won't somebody please think of the Airbnbs?
In what way 'penalise?'

It seems that she's running a side hustle small business. That's fine, but it's legitimate that a) she should be declaring any income after expenses for tax, and b) she should be making a contribution to her direct community to compensate for any externalities that are consequential.

This is basic stuff.
By soulboy
#100977
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Nov 28, 2025 1:04 am

Won't somebody please think of the Airbnbs?
No wonder the farmers are up in arms. Many of them now have short term lets which no doubt are still considered essential to feeding the nation and exempt from inheritance tax.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100986
Labour could have forced the day one rights but might be wise not to.

The Left deserve credit for forcing the 2 child cap to be lifted, but they’ve also got a few “brave” policies in. “Day one rights” may be one, and I think decarbonising electricity so fast may be another, with the risk that lots do decide net zero is too expensive. Other green spending with more immediate payback might have been a better idea. I know that insulation is harder to get right than it seems, but that would be poor households getting the benefit immediately.
By mattomac
#100988
As a trade union member I’d rather get the bill done with minimal fuss than push hard on something that I am in two minds about.

As for the Air BnB person… just charge more and if you aren’t covering it then sell. Why should the government cover your lifestyle? A lifestyle that is beyond attainable for anyone earning less than 50k if not more.

Also she could also rent but I assume she does BnB because she doesn’t want to sign up to any relegulations. The new laws don’t restrict wishing to move back in the property and she could rent it under a licensee/Lodger agreement anyhow. (This is more applicable to her anyhow).

No she’d rather have a lifestyle on the back of public finances and charge silly prices for some holiday types and do the bare minimum to upkeep the property.
Boiler liked this
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#100993
The rough rule with AirBnB is that you need about 20-25% occupancy in order to outrun what you would get on the residential rental market. OK, cleaning costs, bedding crockery, and nick-nacks need to be added, but the economic case is not rocket salad.
By Youngian
#100994
You can understand the popularity of Air BnB when hotel cleaning staff treat you like a freak or criminal because you fancy an afternoon snooze.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#100996
In itself, Air BnB means that lots more space gets used more efficiently than it would have done. One of my friends who is not well off always uses it when he visits his son, and it suits him. There seems to be a big reaction against it because of a small number of hotspots in eg Central Edinburgh. This may or may not be over the top- it's not like Central Edinburgh was Grimsby before Air BnB. Sort out the tax and regulation, and what's the problem? My friend will pay a bit more for his stays in a not particularly expensive part of Leeds, but he'll cope with that better than he will paying hotel prices.
  • 1
  • 222
  • 223
  • 224
  • 225
  • 226
The Greens

Tracey Brabin also doesn't muck about. I qu[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

In itself, Air BnB means that lots more space gets[…]

Conservatives Generally

I think this the right thread for it but Grant […]

So, Rachel Reeves is really spiderman, but so ar[…]