Richard Murphy has finally gone off the rails.
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Mon Jan 12, 2026 10:24 pm Richard Murphy has finally gone off the rails.Where does this prediction (criminalising anti-British unionist ideas) come from? Never even heard of it from tin foil hatters.
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Mon Jan 12, 2026 10:24 pm Richard Murphy has finally gone off the rails.Ha ha ha ha.
Youngian wrote: ↑Tue Jan 13, 2026 1:50 pmThe starting point is that it's illegal for Scotland to hold an independence referendum with Westminster agreement. Which sounds pretty outrageous when put like that, and gives Murphy and co a certain amount of mileage. The trouble is that literally every government in the EU (to which Murphy is strongly committed, and sees as a reason for Scotland to break with rUK) has exactly the same policy as regards separatism.
Where does this prediction (criminalising anti-British unionist ideas) come from? Never even heard of it from tin foil hatters.
After a while bloggers run out of ideas and over reach.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Fri Jul 03, 2026 7:56 pm https://www.thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2026 ... son-trial/I think we should question how someone as stupid as Craig Murray became an ambassador.
Steve and the Canary are still going. Building on heavyweight sources like Craig Murray and Max Blumental, they reckon the "MSM" did Starmer a favour by covering up his propensity for Ukrainian rent boys.
Murray's suggestion that it can't be anything to do with Russia because someone involved speaks Ukrainian is the sort of winning analysis you'd expect from someone who reckoned the Salisbury suspects had come over and promptly left because they were dealing steroids. And somebody called Crispin Flintoff reckons it was funny that the Russian angle was "hastily" presented by the media just after the trial had finished. Because it's inconceivable a journalist might have been working on it for a while and not published because of contempt of court.
Well-written, Abers. Not so well-written, Tahir. […]