By Bones McCoy
#106447
Abernathy wrote: Fri Feb 20, 2026 6:56 pm I see that the government is now apparently considering removing Mountbatten-Windsor from his place in the “line of succession” - a theoretical league table in which various undeserving individuals are ranked in order of their chances of being crowned King or Queen should all of those above them in the league table suddenly die or become otherwise unexpectedly and permanently indisposed. And just typing that out drives home what a farcical, absurd charade the whole fucking set up is. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is at number 8 in the league table behind Prince Willie and his three offspring and Prince Harry and his two sprogs. Which means in reality that the 66 year old paedophile’s best friend is never going to become King. I’ve probably got as good a chance as he has, and I’m not even on the fucking table.

Not really sure why they’re bothering with that.
Let's hope he hasn't watched Kind Hearts and Coronets, eh readers?
Abernathy, lambswool liked this
By Bones McCoy
#106448
Youngian wrote: Fri Feb 20, 2026 9:09 pm The royal team are looking somewhat threadbare, Anne's getting on a bit like the King which has left Edward 'Zeppo' Windsor having to step up.
I understand Harry and dad have had an exploratory reconciliation meeting. This is a notoriously pragmatic family.
They have a lot of Zeppos and at least one Fredo.
Youngian liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#106449
satnav wrote: Fri Feb 20, 2026 10:52 pm William and Kate seem to be good at photo-opportunities but are not great at doing regular work.
For a given (rather unique) definition of the word "work", of course.
kreuzberger liked this
By Bones McCoy
#106466
Abernathy wrote: Sat Feb 21, 2026 11:05 am
satnav wrote: Fri Feb 20, 2026 10:52 pm William and Kate seem to be good at photo-opportunities but are not great at doing regular work.
For a given (rather unique) definition of the word "work", of course.
When you're a posho, work doesn't involve regular things like:
* Fixed hours.
* Timesheets.
* Productivity metrics.
* HR asking you to rate your 'impactfulness' based on five buzzwords they just invented.
* But mostly - doing anything that vaguely resembles work.
By Oboogie
#106469
Bones McCoy wrote: Sat Feb 21, 2026 4:18 pm When you're a posho, work doesn't involve regular things like:
* Fixed hours.
* Timesheets.
* Productivity metrics.
* HR asking you to rate your 'impactfulness' based on five buzzwords they just invented.
* But mostly - doing anything that vaguely resembles work.
When you're a Royal "work" is any activity which doesn't involve eating and drinking too much, blowing the heads off the local fauna or fucking people you shouldn't.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#106474
I'm not linking to it because it's the fucking Spectator, but Andy Batts has a champion. Can you guess who?

Any takers?

Yeah, as you may have guessed, it's Brendan O'Forehead.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#106894
Just wondering whether Andrew Windsor has denied all wrong-doing. I haven’t heard whether he has or not for at least 3 hours. Does anyone know ?
By Youngian
#111163
Just finished the Andrew Lownes book Entitled which chroncles four decades of greed, vanity, grifting and unarguable criminal activity by Andrew and his wife.
Lownes is a seasoned establishment respected biographer who is the antithesis of a tabloid muck raker so god knows what he left out that he couldn't double source.
A remarkable investigation and even the most devoted royal would be hard pressed to debate Lownes's conclusion that this couple should be banged up.
By davidjay
#111313
Youngian wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 8:01 am Just finished the Andrew Lownes book Entitled which chroncles four decades of greed, vanity, grifting and unarguable criminal activity by Andrew and his wife.
Lownes is a seasoned establishment respected biographer who is the antithesis of a tabloid muck raker so god knows what he left out that he couldn't double source.
A remarkable investigation and even the most devoted royal would be hard pressed to debate Lownes's conclusion that this couple should be banged up.
Him definitely but what laws has she broken? I ask because I genuinely don't know.
By satnav
#111326
I think the main focus of the police investigation are claims that he passed on market sensitive information when he was trade envoy. Apparently a lot of the details of his wrong doing were passed on to the palace 6 years ago but they did nothing about it.

I'm very sceptical about the police bringing charges because prosecuting a member of the royal family is probably a sure fire way of ensuring that you won't get a gong upon your retirement.
By Youngian
#111330
davidjay wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 10:41 am
Youngian wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 8:01 am Just finished the Andrew Lownes book Entitled which chroncles four decades of greed, vanity, grifting and unarguable criminal activity by Andrew and his wife.
Lownes is a seasoned establishment respected biographer who is the antithesis of a tabloid muck raker so god knows what he left out that he couldn't double source.
A remarkable investigation and even the most devoted royal would be hard pressed to debate Lownes's conclusion that this couple should be banged up.
Him definitely but what laws has she broken? I ask because I genuinely don't know.
Unless Sarah Ferguson wishes to sue Lownes than she's a fraudster who has been dipping into charity funds for years to spend on her extravagant lifestyle.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#111335
Youngian wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 3:22 pm Unless Sarah Ferguson wishes to sue Lownes than she's a fraudster who has been dipping into charity funds for years to spend on her extravagant lifestyle.
AKA “Doing a Murrell”.
Youngian liked this
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#111341
If we really want to go back to the start, she ripped off Arthur Baldwin's "Hector the Helicopter" books.
By Youngian
#111351
Abernathy wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 4:15 pm
Youngian wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 3:22 pm Unless Sarah Ferguson wishes to sue Lownes than she's a fraudster who has been dipping into charity funds for years to spend on her extravagant lifestyle.
AKA “Doing a Murrell”.
Without trying to sound sympathetic there is something similarly needy and pathetic about the greedy antics of both these characters.
By satnav
#111432
I'm not sure that many of the allegations against Fergie prove that she committed fraud but they certainly suggest that she claimed some outrageous sums of money for doing very little for very worthy charities. Which begs the question why did these charities keep indulging her? If she was an asset to these charities who attracted lots of rich donors to attend events you could understand why they met her demands, but Fergie has never been the kind of person who would pull in people with money and influence.

Hopefully the charities who did indulge Fergie have learned their lessons and changed how they operate so that this kind of stuff doesn't happen again in the future because if they haven't donations to these charities will quickly start to dry up.
  • 1
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

There's been a lot of AI-generated videos of […]

Zeteo UK

Mehdi Hasan's Blighty expansion of his US cur[…]

The BBC

Apologies, but this is beyond a farce. Journalis[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

If Labour think that pandering to the grey vot[…]