User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#111593
Boiler wrote: Thu Jun 04, 2026 2:02 pm If we'd had this at the turn of the last century Alan A. Jackson wouldn't have had anything to write a book* about.
Image

Didn't know he was a writer, but he was very patient putting up with Carol and Bianca.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#111736
In fairness, it looks like the money will be going to charities in Lewisham. But looks like that isn't quite what he said before the election. I think he'd be advised to base the 20% donation on the original salary.

Bigger problem is that he's promised a load of council housing he isn't going to be able to deliver.
Q: There are 11,000 households in Lewisham on the waiting list for social housing, but we know that developers don’t want to build it. How are you going to address this?

A: I think we need to be tougher on developers and not accept a very low quantum of social housing.
The really obvious one is Lewisham Shopping Centre.
Any sort of objections or concerns around a development that only delivers 6% housing for social rent are interpreted by the Labour Party as being anti-homes and anti-development.
It's interpreted as being anti-homes and anti-development by me as well. I don't doubt that you can get them to increase the number of social homes if this is your only yardstick. But you'll lose other stuff in the development- it's very extensive, with student accommodation, key worker, London living rent housing, plus all the work building a new shopping centre. The balance seems broadly OK to me.
  • 1
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
Labour Government 2024 - ?

There's a valid criticism of the over relianc[…]

Conservatives Generally

Project 2025 is a Heritage Foundation thing. Nothi[…]

The Greens

In fairness, it looks like the money will be going[…]

The Times

All the evidence that I've heard from serving[…]