Q: There are 11,000 households in Lewisham on the waiting list for social housing, but we know that developers don’t want to build it. How are you going to address this?It's interpreted as being anti-homes and anti-development by me as well. I don't doubt that you can get them to increase the number of social homes if this is your only yardstick. But you'll lose other stuff in the development- it's very extensive, with student accommodation, key worker, London living rent housing, plus all the work building a new shopping centre. The balance seems broadly OK to me.
A: I think we need to be tougher on developers and not accept a very low quantum of social housing.
The really obvious one is Lewisham Shopping Centre.
Any sort of objections or concerns around a development that only delivers 6% housing for social rent are interpreted by the Labour Party as being anti-homes and anti-development.
Boiler wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 12:20 am This was covered by Farming Today around Christmas time, when vegetables were being sold extremely cheaply by the big supermarkets - it is indeed a loss-leader.The Telegraph shouldn't have put a (justified) summary as if it's a quote, and I hope Polanski complains about that and gets it changed.
Which, if Plankski and his advisors listened to, they would know but no, let's stick to "facts" from social fucking media.
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2026 4:44 pmI really dislike this type of policy and I wasn't pretty surprised to know that both Mussolini and Hitler never took a wage. It opens the doors for funding coming in from elsewhere.
Youngian wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 4:32 pm Rupert Lowe donates his salary to local good causes, its small change to him. Its the culture of the moneyed Victorian amatuer, good chaps from the right class don't ask for money to do good things."Great Yarmouth and Caister Refugee Aid
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2026 7:11 pm One of those young people hit a police officer with a sledgehammer, fracturing her spine.And then proceeded to tell her she's responsible for Gaza whilst she lay injured.
Zack Polanski: The leader of the Green Party’s ratings continue to fall. 20% have a favourable opinion (-3), 47% unfavourable (+3), giving him a net favourability rating of -27. This is Polanski’s worst net favourability rating since he became leader of the Green party. 25% have a favourable of opinion of the Green party, 43% unfavourable. Negative views towards the Greens have increased since the start of the year, and this is the party’s highest unfavourability rating since the Ipsos Political Pulse started tracking them over five years ago (in February 2021).Who'd have guessed that tankie politics isn't that popular? Time to do some proper work.