User avatar
By Abernathy
#112324
I don’t think people really appreciated or understood that Thatcher’s legislation explicitly prohibited councils from using the proceeds from council house sales to fund the replacement of lost social housing stock.
Oboogie, Boiler, Samanfur liked this
User avatar
By Watchman
#112326
Setting aside “historic emails” and utterances from the Reform plumber, even if all that had never happened, how did Reform manage to put forward such a thick twat
Dalem Lake liked this
By davidjay
#112327
Abernathy wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 12:00 am I don’t think people really appreciated or understood that Thatcher’s legislation explicitly prohibited councils from using the proceeds from council house sales to fund the replacement of lost social housing stock.
Like most of her ideas, people didn't care that much. As long as they were better off right that minute she had their vote.
Yug, Dalem Lake, Samanfur liked this
User avatar
By Killer Whale
#112329
davidjay wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 8:07 am
Abernathy wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 12:00 am I don’t think people really appreciated or understood that Thatcher’s legislation explicitly prohibited councils from using the proceeds from council house sales to fund the replacement of lost social housing stock.
Like most of her ideas, people didn't care that much. As long as they were better off right that minute she had their vote.
Fundamentally, the Thatcher years were about cashing in the investment of the post war years and spending it on shiny stuff. It was the lack of investment, in housing, in forward-looking industries, and yes, public services that was the biggest tragedy. Because once you've spent that on consumer goods that eventually wear out, what have you got left? Minimum wage jobs that leave you no money to spend on the trinkets to which you've become addicted.
Boiler, Dalem Lake liked this
User avatar
By Yug
#112334
It was opposed to privatising the railways simply because it couldn't see a logical way of doing it. It didn't want a John Major-type clusterfuck as part of its legacy.
By Bones McCoy
#112339
Yug wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 9:45 am It was opposed to privatising the railways simply because it couldn't see a logical way of doing it. It didn't want a John Major-type clusterfuck as part of its legacy.
Major enjoys a reputation as the "last sane tory leader".
Somewhat enhanced by his Pro EU stand and quiet opposition to the madness of King Boris.

We forget that his second round of privatisations was a poorly considered, damaging barrel scraping exercise.

Railways - bloody chaos, increased pricing and massive subsidies.
(I'm sure our resident rail enthusiasts can comment further).

NHS reorganisation - Massive costs, bureaucracy and the "This trust doesn't overlap your borough's social services" nonsense at the heart of so much bed over-occupancy.
Also destroyed NHS England's structures that should have delivered during Covid-19, replacing them with a bunch of McKinsey preppies.


Am I typing angry - you bet.

For me, not voting Tory (or any Tory spin-offs) isn't about personality or policy.
They aren't fit to be anywhere near the reins of power.
They lie, they cheat, they steal.
All driven by entitlement, without a scrap of remorse.
Makerfield By-election

It was opposed to privatising the railways simpl[…]

Farage's Flagwankers

Yes, be shore of what you want to say, before putt[…]

Kemi Badenoch

Remember the hullabaloo when Red Ken compared a ce[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Streeting is a liquid paraffin-coated shit. He can[…]