It would appear that at least some Green officials aren't overly impressed with the quality of the tankies who have flocked to the Party since the populist prick took over, and seem to be aware that the tankie twats will never agree on anything sensible.
Senior Greens are examining ways to revamp the party’s structures to make it more effective and representative now its membership has more than tripled since Zack Polanski became leader.
Under the party’s direct-democracy model, policy is voted on only by members who attend one of its two annual conferences, a system some Greens believe risks empowering organised fringe activists who make the effort to travel to the events...
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... k-polanski
But... Reading on reveals they may be attempting to create a clusterfuck similar to Your Party.
While no decisions have been made, one possibility would be for local parties to nominate delegates to speak and vote on behalf of members. Another option would be to keep one-member democracy, but allow online voting.
When Polanski became leader of the party in England and Wales last September, it had about 68,000 members. Now it has more than 230,000.
“There is a conversation in the sense that a lot of people are saying: the party has changed a lot, and the structures haven’t changed with it,” one Green official said.
“At the moment, the system of in-person voting means it just involves the members who can afford to book a hotel and take some days off work – it’s quite self-selecting. This has always been the case, but it’s more disproportionate now it’s not 1,000 people out of 68,000, but 1,000 out of 230,000.”...
Hopefully they'll squabble their way to political irrelevance (like the Fruit and Nut), ditch the populist prick, and reinvent themselves as a Green Party. I hope the disaster occurs and the reinvention happens sooner rather than later. A Green Party which cares about Green issues would be quite something.
- By Oboogie