User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#112721
Just for a moment compare the statements from world leaders (not counting Jabba the Cunt), and the response from the no-marks at home.

Find him something big and international to do. Chairing NATO would be a laugh.
Boiler, davidjay, Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#112723
Hopefully not too many other changes to be made at the top. If I had my way, literally everyone who wanted to keep their job would do so, even Mahmood provided she agreed to stop mucking about with the status of existing residents.

But alas Reeves will probably get sacked seeing she’s been targeted almost as much as Starmer by the unholy alliance. And Streeting will likely get something for backing Burnham. I just hope that we don’t get too many other hangers on put in the Cabinet.
By mattomac
#112728
Yeah Powell get something for her service no doubt.

I’d move Wes to Home Office it would nix any possible challenge he may have.

I’d keep Reeves as Chancellor but she will go no doubt, someone half decent mind. Maybe Jones but he will be seen as a Starmer choice so probably not.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#112731
I suspect that Streeting has been promised the chancellorship in return for easing Burnham’s passage (ooo-err) to number ten. Rachel may be persuaded to take a lesser post.
Oboogie liked this
By davidjay
#112736
Abernathy wrote: Mon Jun 22, 2026 8:08 pm I suspect that Streeting has been promised the chancellorship in return for easing Burnham’s passage (ooo-err) to number ten. Rachel may be persuaded to take a lesser post.
And would be totally justified in telling him to shove his dispatch boxes.
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#112744
Give him environment. 3 years standing in shitty rivers looking sad.
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#112953
I was wondering about Badenoch banging on about the government not increasing teacher numbers. Numbers are indeed falling, but that's because pupil numbers are falling quite drastically- by 112,000 over the last year alone. Against that background, a fall in the number of teachers by 2,000 is really not a lot. The ratio in secondary schools is 1 to about 17 pupils. So the Government could reasonably claim there are additional teachers as a result of increased spending, right.

Easy to understand? Apparently not if you lead the largest teaching union.
Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, said the overall fall in teacher numbers was “making a mockery of the government’s promise of 6,500 extra teachers”, with the DfE’s figures showing the number of newly qualified recruits at its lowest since records began 30 years ago.

Kebede said: “The government stands at a crossroads on education. Falling pupil numbers mean there is an opportunity to drastically improve children’s opportunities by increasing school staffing levels and reducing class sizes, as the previous Labour government did 25 years ago.”
Falling pupil numbers means higher staff numbers, and doubtless significantly higher pay. Does he have an economic plan for this? You bet he does. It's "tell Ukraine to fuck off".

https://www.counterfire.org/article/a-b ... -movement/
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#112954
I despair of the NEU - partly from years of extricating their members from classroom situations they had caused but had no idea of how to resolve. Not the brightest and the best.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#112955
Major chaos between Shabana Mahmood and Mike Tapp, a junior minister. Tapp has said that he doesn't support care workers being included in her immigration cap. This is sensible and doubtless kite flying for when Burnham takes over. Mahmood has called for him to be sacked and is now withholding documents from him. Of course she has a point about collective responsibility in normal times. Starmer has played for time, doubtless hoping these two can sort it out. He could sack Tapp and then find that Burnham supports Tapp's policy. That would be ridiculous.

Is it really too much effort to do that? Do they think that the public wants to see this sort of rubbish?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#112970
Talking of Mahmood.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... abour-left
Mahmood outlines safe immigration routes plan to win over Labour left
Sounds like it's not quite the full on fascism that we were led to believe then? These safe routes are basically sponsorship opportunities. This sounds like a decent idea, not just in humanitarian terms but in terms of how easy it should be to settle these refugees and the cost to the government (easier and lower). But numbers over all will doubtless fall because of other restrictions.

Perhaps I'm being paranoid, but I wonder why this has been reported now. Mahmood will have been working on this for ages. The Guardian seems to pick up all manner of whispers, mostly of the sort that make the government sound bad. Could they have been keeping this back till they got their scalp of Starmer? Not that it would have made much difference with 100 bonehead MPs forcing Starmer out, but it might have fucked with a few media narratives (not least at this particular paper).
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#112974
More advice from the Government, from a predictable source- Mariana Mazzucato.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... -mazzucato

This will be the biggest peacetime tax raising Parliament ever. That's a lot of extra money for public services. This makes no impression on her at all, as far as I can tell.
Her judgment on Labour, and its lack of obvious direction, is withering. “Fine, come in, say the Tories were shit, but once you’ve said it, move on!” she cries from the sunny garden of her north London home. “You’ve got five years, so what’s your plan? What’s the positive narrative? It was always half baked … [now] it’s half assed.
As an aside, the direction seems fairly obvious to me- rebuild relations with Europe, reform regulations that inhibit growth (eg planning) and rebuild state capacity. Mazzacato nonetheless manages to undercut this "Labour are shit aren't they?" set up though. Big tax rises aren't "half assed". They're incredibly brave politics.

What's her plan?
As for paying for it? “There’s plenty of money, it’s just not directed towards anything, and government’s part of the problem.”
What does this mean? Oh.
“The reason I’m hopeful is that all of this is possible,” says Mazzucato. “[You need] a happy narrative [for the common good] that would inspire young people. Like the Artemis going to the moon – it doesn’t have to be space, but really ambitious missions make people dream. They’re all looking up at the sky.”
Or makes people say "just sort out my fucking hospital/ school/ road" perhaps. And it's unlikely this spending on elite science will be happening in Stoke.

The journo gives her a real hard time.
In her 2013 book, The Entrepreneurial State, she exploded the neoliberal myth that only the private sector can innovate, demonstrating that economic success comes as much from the public sector as from captains of industry. (To take one ironic example, the internet, ultimate power source of the libertarian tech billionaires, started out as a government project.)

In The Big Con, published in 2023, Mazzucato and co-author Rosie Collington exposed how the reliance of governments on the consultancy class “weakens our businesses, infantilises our governments and warps our economies”.
Not just argued these things. Exploded myths and exposed! Starmer might wish he had interviewers like this. Anyway, who said the public sector can't innovate?

Any more pearls of wisdom?
She speaks with passion about human self-expression and creativity – “we unfortunately talk too much to economists, too little to poets” – and gets even more excited talking about swimming and football. Her beloved Arsenal won the Premier League shortly before our interview, sparking a spontaneous gathering at the team’s north London stadium that she saw as an outpouring of community spirit. For Mazzucato, if we are to save ourselves, the place to do so will be in public places, in the fun of carnivals, in the community spaces where the common good is expressed, though not always articulated.
Why can't every part of the country have a very rich football team who win the league?
  • 1
  • 302
  • 303
  • 304
  • 305
  • 306
The Greens

We might be in for the silliest season since recor[…]

Telegraph

And if I read the piece right. Eat them - so we d[…]

Reform Party

That's why it would be stupid for a new Labou[…]

Andy Burnham

Ed wasn't exactly a big tax raiser when he wa[…]