- Fri Jul 03, 2026 7:09 pm
#113383
I wrote to my MP :
Dear Tahir,
I am writing as a Labour member and constituent to express how deeply disappointed and upset I am about the way that Sir Keir Starmer has been treated
I know politics is difficult. I know leaders make mistakes. I am not writing to pretend that everything was perfect, because no Prime Minister gets everything right. However, It does seem to me that a decent, serious, and honourable man has been hounded, undermined, and pushed out after doing the hard work of making Labour electable again and bringing the party back into government.
Keir inherited a country damaged by fourteen years of Conservative mismanagement, austerity, Brexit, broken public services, economic instability, and deep division. No one could have repaired that quickly. Yet instead of being given patience, loyalty, and space to govern, he was attacked relentlessly from outside the party and, in my view, failed by too many within it.
What I find particularly difficult is that many people are now saying what a good, decent, and serious man he is after the damage has already been done. Where were those voices when he was being hounded daily by the right-wing media, Reform, the permanently outraged and some from his own side?
I am also very concerned by the way this now appears to be moving towards Andy Burnham as though his leadership is inevitable. I do not accept that Labour members should simply be expected to fall into line. Members campaign, pay subscriptions, knock on doors, defend the party, and carry the Labour message into our communities. We should not be treated as an inconvenience when it comes to the future leadership of our own party.
I also have to say that, from the outside, this has the appearance of something that has been building for months rather than something that has happened suddenly. The speed with which Andy Burnham is now being spoken about as the natural successor makes many of us feel that this has been politically managed and arranged long before ordinary members were given any say at all.
I appreciate that people will deny the word “coup”, however that is how it looks to many Labour members. It feels as though a sitting Labour Prime Minister has been steadily undermined, pushed out, and then replaced in public discussion by someone who has not done the work of leading the party nationally or winning the mandate Sir Keir won.
What makes this feel even worse is that it does not currently look as though there will be a proper election in which members get to choose between candidates. It also appears, from the outside, as though MPs are being discouraged from challenging, for example Darren Jones or anyone else who may have offered members a different choice.
Andy Burnham has not served in government for over ten years. Politics has changed. The country has changed. The media landscape has changed. The threat from Reform has changed. I hope to God this works out, because I do not want anything that gives Reform momentum or increases the risk of them gaining power.
However, I recognise that Andy Burnham can communicate well and perform strongly in interviews. But this is different from having recently carried the pressure of national government, the Treasury, foreign policy, Europe, defence, Parliament, the media, and the daily machinery of running the country.
There are thousands of Keir Starmer supporters across social media who feel angry, hurt and politically homeless right now. I belong to one Keir Starmer support group alone with over 12,500 members, and there are many other groups and supporters who feel the same. We should not be dismissed as though we do not exist.
If there is a proper leadership contest, members should have a voice. I accept that the process may not give me the say I would like, and I understand I would have to accept that. However, accepting it does not mean I have to like it.
My concern is not only personal loyalty to Keir. It is also about what this says about the Labour Party. If a leader can make Labour electable again, win a huge majority, take on an almost impossible job, and still be pushed out before the foundations he laid have had time to show results, then what message does that send?
I am also deeply concerned about the direction of Labour’s relationship with Europe. I believed Sir Keir was moving carefully and pragmatically towards closer ties with Europe, and ultimately, I think a second referendum on EU membership would have been included in the next manifesto, if SKS had remained P.M.
However, that does not mean every step towards repairing Brexit damage requires another referendum. The 2016 vote was to leave the European Union. It was not a specific public vote to leave the single market or customs union. Rejoining the single market or customs union, or negotiating much closer economic alignment, could be pursued through a clear manifesto mandate and parliamentary process.
Brexit was a Tory project, delivered by Tory Prime Ministers, and it has made this country poorer, weaker, more divided, and less influential. Labour should be honest about that and should not be afraid of rebuilding our relationship with Europe.
I am frightened that this could become another round of Labour internal warfare at the exact moment Reform and the right are waiting to benefit from chaos. Whatever people think of Keir, I believe the way he has been treated has been wrong.
I am not writing in the hope of receiving a standard political reply or words intended to reassure me. Though I would, of course, be interested in your views. I am writing to place on record, as a Labour member and constituent, that I am deeply unhappy with the way this has unfolded, with the apparent direction of travel, and with the way loyal Labour members who supported Keir are being expected to simply accept it and move on. I wanted to make you fully aware that there is a strong strength of feeling about this in the members’ communities that should not be ignored.
Yours sincerely,
Abernathy.
"The opportunity to serve our country: that is all we ask.” John Smith, May 11, 1994.