[Crabcakes]

Funny how the casting of Matt Damon as a Greek king despite him being a decidedly non-Greek bloke from the US, and Tom Holland, an equally non-Greek and if anything quite pale and northern european-looking British chap, as the non-Greek guy’s Greek son hasn’t phased him at all.

I’m certain they’re next on his list though.

[Bones McCoy]

A story about a bloke and his crew getting lost in the Med.
A large proportion of which borders on Africa.

He's heading home form a war which included an Aethiopian* allied contingent.
* Classical term for Sub-Saharan Africa.

But the problem isn't the American hero, his British son or the Afrikaaner sea witch.
Not even the Californian one-eyed giant - played by a two-eyed 5'11" guy.

Ohh no ... it's the usual suspects.


As I repeat ad ennui.
The problem we'll struggle to erase isn't the mouth-breathers who say this stuff.
It's the press and media who ought to know better, but mindlessly repeat and lend it credibility.

[soulboy]

Go woke, go broke.

Odyssey's box office figures so far

Domestic (53.8%)
$163,678,510
International (46.2%)
$140,297,000
Worldwide
$303,975,510

[mattomac]

I do love the historical accuracy being spouted for a story that has historical context but also has visits to islands full of monsters and one to the underworld.

[Oboogie]

I do love the historical accuracy being spouted for a story that has historical context but also has visits to islands full of monsters and one to the underworld.

Exactly, it's not history, it's historical fiction and an author can muck about with another author's fictional work as much as they like and the audience can pick and choose which version they prefer.

[Bones McCoy]

He'd have got home to Ithaca a lot quicka.

But some cunt failed to deliver the promised hyperloop. (Winks)

[Malcolm Armsteen]

How a Mycaenian (Trojan) warrior would have really looked:



I've just painted one in 54mm...

[davidjay]

I do love the historical accuracy being spouted for a story that has historical context but also has visits to islands full of monsters and one to the underworld.

Exactly, it's not history, it's historical fiction and an author can muck about with another author's fictional work as much as they like and the audience can pick and choose which version they prefer.

You mean like the Bible?

[Oboogie]

I do love the historical accuracy being spouted for a story that has historical context but also has visits to islands full of monsters and one to the underworld.

Exactly, it's not history, it's historical fiction and an author can muck about with another author's fictional work as much as they like and the audience can pick and choose which version they prefer.

You mean like the Bible?

I was only taught the King James version (and I've forgotten most of that) so I'm not really qualified to comment.

I was recently listening to a podcast where somebody was venting about US remakes of British TV and film - The Office, The Italian Job etc - his line was that the originals were the "real" ones. My reaction was neither are real as neither exist. If you prefer the original then say that, but both are fictional and I can't get excited about changes.

What I do take exception to is rewriting history eg U-571 in which a real Royal Navy operation is transferred to the US Navy presumably for sake of box-office. If you're going to tell a true story, tell it as truthfully as you can.