User avatar
By Yug
#114812
RacistUK down, Greens down, Lib Dems down. Could populism be losing its popularity? Let's hope so.
Oboogie liked this
By Oboogie
#114835
Yug wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2026 6:22 am RacistUK down, Greens down, Lib Dems down. Could populism be losing its popularity? Let's hope so.
Hopefully, although the timing's unfortunate for Labour.
Boiler, davidjay liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#114941
The Reform plus Tory score there is uncomfortably high. For all the claims made for PR, that would give them a good chance of forming the government.
By davidjay
#114948
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2026 6:21 pm The Reform plus Tory score there is uncomfortably high. For all the claims made for PR, that would give them a good chance of forming the government.
And they'll do a deal before you can say "Merger".
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#114951
That's what I'm worried about. While the Greens stand candidates v Labour everywhere because "complicity in genocide" or something.

Anyway, I thought the Greens were the real opposition to Reform. On that poll they seem to be 5th.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#115149
Bev Craig elected in Manchester, on a truly pitiful turnout.

Craig (Labour): 309,535 - 66.3%
Astley (Reform): 157,178 - 33.7%
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#115150
The polling was accurate then. The Tories came 5th. Reform didn’t get all the second preferences they might have done from Restore and the Tories. Wonder which group held back?
By Bones McCoy
#115154
I wonder whether the uncomfortable element of voter intelligence was in play with those transfers.

I'm far from on board with social Darwinism (misnamed) or eugenics.
But I do hark back to the earliest Scottish elections held with transferrable votes.

They didn't run as predicted with around sixty percent of voters rolling up and marking their X as usual.
A lower than expected proportion of votes were transferred and counting ended earlier than expected.

Post analysis showed a greater proportion in the posh areas had read the instructions or listened to the information broadcasts and numbered down 1, 2, 3.

Shift this to Greater Manchester and consider the typical Restore/Reform aligned voter - or Tory who'd consider them a credible second place. T.A.P.S?


Other causes also spring to mind.
* Traditional Ken Clarke / Michael Heseltine Tories who consider N.F. beyond the pale.
* New "Move fast break stuff" Tories who think N.F's star is setting - scandal and all that.
* Restore hard men with internicine distain for Reform "softies".


I say Let them fight!
Last edited by Bones McCoy on Sat Aug 01, 2026 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#115177
I once stood for election (unsuccessfully) at an “all-up” city council election in a ward that had to elect two councillors, so voters had two votes. At the count, I kept seeing ballot papers that had one vote for me, and the second vote for the (then) BNP candidate.

I felt strongly that I didn’t want those fucking votes. If I could have relinquished them, I would have done.
  • 1
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
Nargle Fargle

George Cottrell used to work for Roman Abramovitch[…]

The Gender Identity Issue.

The problem with paying Danegeld is that the Dan[…]

Elon Musk

Can't somebody just chuck this cunt into on[…]

Labour, generally.

I once stood for election (unsuccessfully) at an &[…]