[Tubby Isaacs]

The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?

[Oboogie]

The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?

Government by Daily Telegraph
"The right to trail by jury is enshrined in Magna Carta"
"But most cases are heard in Magistrates Courts without juries"
"Hush now and look furious at the socialists destroying Britain"

[davidjay]

The right to trial by jury is one of those things, like the church down the road, that only affects a tiny minority of the population. You could live a dozen lives and never be called for jury service, live a hundred without standing trial before your peers. I doubt one in a thousand Christians will worship this Sunday (and none of them will be Steven Yaxley-Lennon or Paul Golding). But the merest suggestion of either being scrapped and it's all a cultural Marxist Fabian woke plot that must be challenged.

[The Weeping Angel]

The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?

So how are we going to clear the court backlog now?

[Oboogie]

The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?

So how are we going to clear the court backlog now?

That story isn't on the front pages at the moment so who cares?

[The Weeping Angel]

What's he playing at?

https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/d ... k-11082020

Derbyshire Live understands both organisations were informed last night the PM would be at the visit and they would be able to speak to him.

Our reporter was also called by the DWP last night and told only Pat McFadden would be present, then given an arrival time. Our reporter arrived at the time he was told, which turned out to be just as the other media organisations were finishing their interviews with Mr Burnham.

Nigel repeatedly asked to speak to Mr Burnham and was told “Pat McFadden is handling the media.” Then: “He’s on a tight schedule” and finally just a straightforward “no”.

[davidjay]

It looks to me like a local journalist doing a bit of "Don't you know who I am?" He spoke to the BBC and a national press agency. He didn't have time to speak to everyone and from the response he didn't miss much.

[Dalem Lake]

I wouldn't class anything under the Reach PLC umbrella as journalism tbh. Their assorted local "Live" pages are ad-strewn, click-bait shite.

[Boiler]

I wouldn't class anything under the Reach PLC umbrella as journalism tbh. Their assorted local "Live" pages are ad-strewn, click-bait shite.

I once read a story under the "Birmingham Live" banner, found it to be utter bollocks and I have ignored anything under the "(name here) Live" in search results ever since.

[davidjay]

Birmingham Live might possibly be the worst website in the world. Luckily much of it is now paywalled so it's even less-read.

[mattomac]

Cornwall Live headlines sometimes are the level of an angry admin on a Facebook group.

[Bones McCoy]

There's a YouTube channel called Glasgow Alive.
It's been going since 2022, but has only recently been promoted into my views.

About 2 months ago it's style pivoted from "Here's some news about Glasgow" to "Shock horror, Glasgow has fallen".
Postings are a collection of old video clips montaged to imply there are daily major police incidents.

It doesn't go away in response to "Don't recommend this channel" requests.


I find the editorial pivot and simultaneous unusual algorithmic promotion rather suspicious.

Were I set on spreading misinformation, a subverted existing channel would be a better tool than a new obvious astroturf.


There's been an escalation on social media since Nigel's public image problems.