User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#115136
The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?
By Oboogie
#115140
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Fri Jul 31, 2026 6:39 pm The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?
Government by Daily Telegraph
"The right to trail by jury is enshrined in Magna Carta"
"But most cases are heard in Magistrates Courts without juries"
"Hush now and look furious at the socialists destroying Britain"
By davidjay
#115141
The right to trial by jury is one of those things, like the church down the road, that only affects a tiny minority of the population. You could live a dozen lives and never be called for jury service, live a hundred without standing trial before your peers. I doubt one in a thousand Christians will worship this Sunday (and none of them will be Steven Yaxley-Lennon or Paul Golding). But the merest suggestion of either being scrapped and it's all a cultural Marxist Fabian woke plot that must be challenged.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#115142
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Fri Jul 31, 2026 6:39 pm The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?
So how are we going to clear the court backlog now?
By Oboogie
#115143
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Jul 31, 2026 7:53 pm
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Fri Jul 31, 2026 6:39 pm The jury trial changes are being scrapped. All that work wasted because an unholy alliance kicked off against them. Estimated time savings of 2-10% seem worth having to me, but apparently no. Good luck with finding the “real investment that’s needed”. Perhaps we could have saved a bit of time with these reforms while we tackle everything else?
So how are we going to clear the court backlog now?
That story isn't on the front pages at the moment so who cares?
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#115196
What's he playing at?

https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/d ... k-11082020
Derbyshire Live understands both organisations were informed last night the PM would be at the visit and they would be able to speak to him.

Our reporter was also called by the DWP last night and told only Pat McFadden would be present, then given an arrival time. Our reporter arrived at the time he was told, which turned out to be just as the other media organisations were finishing their interviews with Mr Burnham.

Nigel repeatedly asked to speak to Mr Burnham and was told “Pat McFadden is handling the media.” Then: “He’s on a tight schedule” and finally just a straightforward “no”.
By davidjay
#115198
It looks to me like a local journalist doing a bit of "Don't you know who I am?" He spoke to the BBC and a national press agency. He didn't have time to speak to everyone and from the response he didn't miss much.
User avatar
By Boiler
#115201
Dalem Lake wrote: Sun Aug 02, 2026 5:00 pm I wouldn't class anything under the Reach PLC umbrella as journalism tbh. Their assorted local "Live" pages are ad-strewn, click-bait shite.
I once read a story under the "Birmingham Live" banner, found it to be utter bollocks and I have ignored anything under the "(name here) Live" in search results ever since.
By davidjay
#115203
Birmingham Live might possibly be the worst website in the world. Luckily much of it is now paywalled so it's even less-read.
By mattomac
#115204
Cornwall Live headlines sometimes are the level of an angry admin on a Facebook group.
By Bones McCoy
#115206
There's a YouTube channel called Glasgow Alive.
It's been going since 2022, but has only recently been promoted into my views.

About 2 months ago it's style pivoted from "Here's some news about Glasgow" to "Shock horror, Glasgow has fallen".
Postings are a collection of old video clips montaged to imply there are daily major police incidents.

It doesn't go away in response to "Don't recommend this channel" requests.


I find the editorial pivot and simultaneous unusual algorithmic promotion rather suspicious.

Were I set on spreading misinformation, a subverted existing channel would be a better tool than a new obvious astroturf.


There's been an escalation on social media since Nigel's public image problems.
Boiler liked this
By Youngian
#115233
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sun Aug 02, 2026 3:20 pm What's he playing at?

https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/d ... k-11082020
Derbyshire Live understands both organisations were informed last night the PM would be at the visit and they would be able to speak to him.

Our reporter was also called by the DWP last night and told only Pat McFadden would be present, then given an arrival time. Our reporter arrived at the time he was told, which turned out to be just as the other media organisations were finishing their interviews with Mr Burnham.

Nigel repeatedly asked to speak to Mr Burnham and was told “Pat McFadden is handling the media.” Then: “He’s on a tight schedule” and finally just a straightforward “no”.
He’s the PM not a sunset years Tony Benn touring town halls.
davidjay liked this
By davidjay
#115240
mattomac wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2026 12:14 am Cornwall Live headlines sometimes are the level of an angry admin on a Facebook group.
Given the sort of wages Reach pay there's probably not much difference.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#115247
He’s keeping another 1,000 in prison compared with Starmer. Smart politics? Possibly though the capacity problems are terrifying.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#115314
This may or may not be a good idea, may not amount to much at all, or may just be good communication to encourage smaller businesses to get involved. But I'd be surprised if "soft left Starmer critic" Lou Haigh would have been cheerleading for it under the previous PM- some of this stuff relates to green issues.

Actually, that may be unfair, I think she is more open minded on "growth" stuff than some, so she may be a bad example. But the green angle would have led the news in liberal-left media for days.

  • 1
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
Andy Burnham

This may or may not be a good idea, may not amount[…]

Kemi Badenoch

"You'd really like him if you only m[…]

Guardian

Don't know if anyone else has been following […]

Conservatives Generally

Yep. And his main thing now seems to be posting[…]