User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#115823
The large arrays are getting common here in France, with one especially huge one in a field near here, also used to store hay and fodder underneath. A lot of farms have big (10m2) panels, and there are sizeable grants available for domestic installations and for heat exchange thingies. It can be done...
User avatar
By Yug
#115827
You seem to forget, Malc, that one of the Brexit bonuses is for us to no longer have access to EU funds for nice things. Instead, we have Johnson, Gove, Fargle and Cummings' extra £350 million a week, which wasn't a lie in any way shape or form at all, oh no it wasn't.
Malcolm Armsteen liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#115829
Oboogie wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 10:39 am
Opposition to renewables from both the fossil fuel companies and the Unions is very much political pressure.
There's no real opposition to renewables over car parks, on warehouses, that sort of thing. Much greater opposition to very large solar farms, wind farms etc.
By Oboogie
#115834
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 2:13 pm
Oboogie wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 10:39 am
Opposition to renewables from both the fossil fuel companies and the Unions is very much political pressure.
There's no real opposition to renewables over car parks, on warehouses, that sort of thing. Much greater opposition to very large solar farms, wind farms etc.
Which is precisely why there's political pressure against carport solar, the nimbies have already got the fields covered.
Boiler liked this
By Oboogie
#115843
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 4:28 pm Nimbies are ok with car parks but not solar panels overhead?

I’ve not heard of that. I hear plenty about solar and wind farms, and pylons.
That's exactly my point, Nimbys won't complain that their view of ASDA's car park has been ruined, that is why, in order to halt solar, the fossil fuel industry (including the Unions) have to pile on political pressure to prevent those carparks being turned into solar farms. BECAUSE THE NIMBYS WON'T
User avatar
By Yug
#115844
There are numerous news articles about nimbys protesting against electric car charging points on their high streets. It's only a matter of time before they decide their view of the sky while sitting in their cars in sainsbury's car park mustn't be blocked by overhead solar panels.

They're all in favour of clean green energy production and non-polluting cars, just not here thank you very much.
User avatar
By Boiler
#115846
Oboogie wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:04 pm That's exactly my point, Nimbys won't complain that their view of ASDA's car park has been ruined, that is why, in order to halt solar, the fossil fuel industry (including the Unions) have to pile on political pressure to prevent those carparks being turned into solar farms. BECAUSE THE NIMBYS WON'T
Quite. Just listen to the noises made by unions about job losses in Aberdeen if Rosebank doesn't go ahead.
By Oboogie
#115848
Boiler wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 6:55 pm
Oboogie wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:04 pm That's exactly my point, Nimbys won't complain that their view of ASDA's car park has been ruined, that is why, in order to halt solar, the fossil fuel industry (including the Unions) have to pile on political pressure to prevent those carparks being turned into solar farms. BECAUSE THE NIMBYS WON'T
Quite. Just listen to the noises made by unions about job losses in Aberdeen if Rosebank doesn't go ahead.
According to Phil Moorhouse, Rosebank will generate 17 new jobs and if that isn't a good reason for Unite to oppose solar energy, I don't know what is!
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#115849
Oboogie wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 7:15 pm
According to Phil Moorhouse, Rosebank will generate 17 new jobs and if that isn't a good reason for Unite to oppose solar energy, I don't know what is!
It's Jackdaw, and the 17 jobs figure is likely bullshit, so surprised he quotes it.

From the article that started this.
Only 27 direct full-time jobs would be created by Jackdaw, one of the biggest gasfields remaining in the North Sea, according to an environmental impact assessment filed publicly by its owner, Adura, a joint venture between Shell and Norway’s Equinor.

The document states: “Over the lifetime of the field there would be a consistent level of employment averaging at nearly 500 jobs a year in direct, indirect and induced employment – this includes 273 direct jobs which exist on the Shearwater host installation and [an] additional 27 Jackdaw-specific jobs.”
And anyway, even if there were zero jobs, the gas extracted will be taxed at 78%. We might as well have that rather than Qatar.
  • 1
  • 307
  • 308
  • 309
  • 310
  • 311
Nimbies

What case? The pylons aren't going to des[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

According to Phil Moorhouse, Rosebank will gene[…]

Reform Party

These dickheads have got nearly 3 years worth of[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

He's also accused South Korea of being ungrat[…]