[Yug]

"Winning the argument" is more important than winning the election.

What these twats don't seem to understand is: by not getting enough votes in the right places to win the election they have actually lost the argument.

One of the definitions of winning is 'coming out on top'. Having enough MPs to be the Party of Opposition (or worse in the case of the Greens with their count-on-your-fingers number of MPs) cannot be described as 'coming out on top' and certainly isn't in the same building as 'winning'.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Burnham talking about cleaning up very large toxic waste dumps today. There's one in Makerfield, which was an issue in the by-election. Starmer had announced a similar clean up of some other sites, don't know how those progressed.

These are an enormous issue which project a sense of government not caring and being incompetent, so good to focus on it. They seem to be too large for local authorities to cope with, so central government has to do it. Waste on private land is a massive issue in lots of places. Obviously, it's the landowner's responsibility but surely there's some scope for government/council removing it when it's incredibly unhealthy for people living all around it? Jaywick in Clacton has tons of these dumps on derelict properties right by occupied properties. Does there not come a point where they accept that the (very absent) landowner isn't going to remove it.

[soulboy]

Don't you mean (very absent) MP?

If only the good residents of Jaywick had someone to fight their corner.

[Tubby Isaacs]

It’s a very long term problem in Jaywick. I’m sure Giles Watling had a go at getting it removed even in Farage hasn’t.

[Tubby Isaacs]

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... lish-exams

What do you do with students who don't pass GCSE English and/or Maths? Current policy seems to be failing- only one in seven retake Maths and pass and only one in six retake English and pass. So I quite like the idea of another qualification for them that they have more chance of passing. But the new policy seems to be that they take that, then have to retake GCSE. That's a long haul for a 16 year old who probably hates and fears exams. Are they going to stick around in school for that? It was an idea from Becky Francis, who seems to be very good overall.

[Tubby Isaacs]

One area where I think there's space for improvement in comms is data centers. I don't know much about them, but my natural bias is towards building them and adding renewables capacity, even though I recognize the scale of that challenge, and that the developers will have a go at paying for as little of it as possible.

They've become enormously unpopular in the US with both sides, and it's heading the same way here, when you read things like this-

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... o-new-york

Proposed London datacentre will have annual carbon footprint of 27,000 flights to New York
Exclusive: Planning documents show datacentre in North Ockendon would be incompatible with UK net zero targets

The article's fine, nobody can say it's misrepresenting the challenge. My worry is that we become like the mood in the US (which has many faults, but will get things done in a "fuck you" kind of way, which has some benefits, if not for people at the sharp end). We're going to end up not doing anything at this rate. A very effective synergy will form with pure nimbyism.

But this would seem to be a suitable challenge for Action Andy and his considerable comms skills. It's private investment, it's tech, it's future growth, it's an engineering challenge. And for Andy it's making the developer pay a fair share of the costs (Ofgem have proposals).