:sunglasses: 32 % :pray: 16 % :laughing: 36 % :cry: 12 % :🤗 4 %
User avatar
By Watchman
#62555
I read an interesting comment elsewhere, on how the majority of the filming was from behind Richie Rich, not sure if that was to capture the ecstasy of the audience - well that went well, or his charisma was too much for a full frontal
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#62559
Misdirection, I'd guess. Hides the true size of the audience/studio, and keeps viewers' attention moving around. That or the camera operator fancies themselves directing music videos.
By mattomac
#62737
Andy McDandy wrote: Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:28 am Misdirection, I'd guess. Hides the true size of the audience/studio, and keeps viewers' attention moving around. That or the camera operator fancies themselves directing music videos.
Don’t stand your back to the audience is rule one, luckily for him the audience at home was probably only slightly bigger.
User avatar
By Watchman
#62874
Apologies for the source, but I do find it funny
However, whoever dreamt it up needs their bumps feeling; it was bound to attract this sort of response, but more importantly, why the fuck is he wasting time doing this when there is so much more important issues he should be addressing


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... hools.html
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#62876
Because mobile phones in general and those in the hands of kids in particular seriously wind up the repulsive gonad-faced gargoyles in the Tory Local Associations. I don't think people realise just how vile those Tory members are.
In answer - he has gone full Corbynite and has retreated to speaking only to his own smallest base.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#62879
Some viewers of the social media video praised the PM's acting performance, with one commenting: 'And the Oscar goes to...'

Another said: 'Bro chose the wrong profession', while a third even claimed: 'Sunak's acting puts him in the running to be the next Bond, no?'
Someone explain sarcasm to the Mail's readers.
mattomac liked this
By Youngian
#62893
Bit late for sucking up to farmers. Is Rishi’s robot rollout subject to due diligence (‘bureaucracy’)?
Planning applications aren’t complicated what ‘bureaucracy’ will Sunak be slashing?
Mr Sunak said £220m will be put into new food-productivity schemes, farm technology and automation to "reduce reliance on overseas workers" during the next financial year.

He also announced plans to cut bureaucracy around permitted development rights, so farmers can more easily diversify and develop new businesses, such as farm shops, commercial space and sporting venues. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-envi ... 342314.amp
  • 1
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 148
Labour Government 2024 - ?

I was wondering what the UK paid to be in Horizon.[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

I see Daniel Peacock who was a fairly hot property[…]

Harry & Meg Vs Tabloids

Harry can have all the armoury he wants in the US,[…]

Famously posh hotels are all trying to move into[…]