[Abernathy]

No. It’s bollocks.

[The Weeping Angel]

Thanks, could you elaborate on that a little bit?

[Abernathy]

Okay. Obsessed with winning the next election? Bollocks. If that were really the case, would the government be implementing unpopular policies on the means testing of the winter fuel allowance and the restrictions on welfare benefits ? If the next (general) election had been last Thursday, Labour would theoretically have lost to Farage. So the government clearly isn’t “obsessed” with the next election. There is a recognition that the totality of what Starmer needs to achieve will take more than a single term, so there must of necessity always be one eye on re-election, but that is true of any government. But it isn’t true of a government that is just 9 months old.

[The Weeping Angel]

Thanks.

[The Weeping Angel]

I'm not sure how true this is, but if it is a terrible idea.

[The Weeping Angel]

More here.

[Boiler]

I remember when the BBC came under the Home Office. I wonder if this will mean the BBC will be put under business, prior to its (inevitable) privatisation/conversion to a subscription model post-charter renewal? ITV and Channel 4 are also having struggles: https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... al-mergers

Won't this just be seen as tinkering at the edges though? Again, I don't see this cutting through to say, the disillusioned voters of Annfield Plain and Tanfield council ward (although given their new council representative...).

[Boiler]

Outbreak of rabies in Portugal;

https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2025/0 ... s.html?m=1

[The Weeping Angel]

Ah, Tim Fenton, now there's someone we don't need to hear from.

[davidjay]

Ah, Tim Fenton, now there's someone we don't need to hear from.

His mate Anonymous can keep quiet as well.