:sunglasses: 36.4 % :laughing: 45.5 % :cry: 9.1 % :poo: 9.1 %
User avatar
By Abernathy
#88526
Okay. Obsessed with winning the next election? Bollocks. If that were really the case, would the government be implementing unpopular policies on the means testing of the winter fuel allowance and the restrictions on welfare benefits ? If the next (general) election had been last Thursday, Labour would theoretically have lost to Farage. So the government clearly isn’t “obsessed” with the next election. There is a recognition that the totality of what Starmer needs to achieve will take more than a single term, so there must of necessity always be one eye on re-election, but that is true of any government. But it isn’t true of a government that is just 9 months old.
User avatar
By Boiler
#88603
I remember when the BBC came under the Home Office. I wonder if this will mean the BBC will be put under business, prior to its (inevitable) privatisation/conversion to a subscription model post-charter renewal? ITV and Channel 4 are also having struggles: https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... al-mergers

Won't this just be seen as tinkering at the edges though? Again, I don't see this cutting through to say, the disillusioned voters of Annfield Plain and Tanfield council ward (although given their new council representative...).
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#88614
On reflection, "Education and Culture" could work, with Broadcasting going in the Business department. I wish Universities were back there too, Bridget Philipson (sacked or unsacked) hasn't shown much interest in them. I think Peter Kyle might do better with them though. Seeing he became an MP in 2015, I don't get what "Blairite" has to do with anything. As he's been Science minister, that might be quite forward looking.

The downside is that Culture and Sport loses its dedicated voice in the Cabinet. That might not be very popular.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#88615
Boiler wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 9:44 am I remember when the BBC came under the Home Office. I wonder if this will mean the BBC will be put under business, prior to its (inevitable) privatisation/conversion to a subscription model post-charter renewal? ITV and Channel 4 are also having struggles: https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... al-mergers

Won't this just be seen as tinkering at the edges though? Again, I don't see this cutting through to say, the disillusioned voters of Annfield Plain and Tanfield council ward (although given their new council representative...).

More likely Broadcasting goes to the Business department, I think. Would be like when Vince Cable had first say on the Sky takeover.
  • 1
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
Education, Education, Education

Ha ha ha ha. Surprised the Independent Schools Cou[…]

Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

He got called out for that, albeit for the s[…]

Conservatives Generally

Man's a cunt. Cunt in silly trousers.

Kemi Badenoch

Badenoch says more children, not immigration, wil[…]