:sunglasses: 36.4 % :laughing: 45.5 % :cry: 9.1 % :poo: 9.1 %
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#88738
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... -programme
British scientists are “over the moon” to be back in the EU’s flagship science research programme Horizon after a three-year Brexit lockout, with new data revealing they have been awarded about £500m in grants since re-entry.

As the EU secretly draws up strategies for the next seven-year funding cycle in 2027, the UK is hoping its success in the first 12 months since returning to Horizon will leave it in pole position with Germany and France to dominate European science, despite Brexit.

With projects ranging from the research to develop brain catheters inspired by wasps to efforts to create aviation fuel from yeast and greenhouse gases, the UK has been catapulted to the top of the league of non-EU beneficiaries by number of grants. And, at fifth position behind Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and France, it looks set to resume its overall place in the coming 12 months.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#88749
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... SApp_Other
Keir Starmer’s senior team has been discussing for several weeks how to handle public anger over the policy, which bubbled over in last Thursday’s local elections, when the party lost two-thirds of the council seats it was defending.

While a full reversal of the cut is not expected, No 10 sources said they were considering whether to increase the £11,500 threshold over which pensioners are no longer eligible for the allowance.

Labour MPs have been piling pressure on the government to change its mind over the winter fuel payment, as well as its plans for £5bn benefit cuts, before a vote on “stage one” of its welfare plans in early June.[/quot
e]

My view is that the policy was implemented badly and not communicated clearly. The reaction was in my view, completely over the top and the mass death of pensioners never happened either.
Dalem Lake, davidjay liked this
By Youngian
#88755
Former Conservative voters aren't angry at the government for tightening public spending. And neither should the government rush in panic measures or voting for Nigel gets things done.
And maybe start a ferry service so asylum applicants can safely reach British territory, preferably St Helena.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#88758
It’s fixing the wrong issue though. The WFA is one that Reform/Tory voters didn’t like because it affected them directly as the group who didn’t need it but liked having a nice little bonus. Tweaking that is going to make no difference because they’ll still vote reform/tory for all the other reasons they would do that, just with a few more quid.

The benefit cuts affect a much more diverse group who would in many cases usually be more inclined to vote labour because (historically)Labour are the party most likely to not remove support for them and consider their needs. Reconsider them, and you’re potentially winning back actual votes as opposed to fantasy ones you were never getting anyway.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#88759
I see that the WFP is 'under review'.

I personally think that the government was right to means-test it, but to change course now would silence the 'not listening' critics amongst the Guardianistas. The right would have a field day, but it would sound hollow.
  • 1
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

I'm confused, I thought Hollywood was faili[…]

Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Ibis are good, in my experience.

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I see that the WFP is 'under review'. I[…]

Reform Party

Special shout out to Mark Seddon for playing the[…]