:sunglasses: 36.4 % :laughing: 45.5 % :cry: 9.1 % :poo: 9.1 %
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#88738
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... -programme
British scientists are “over the moon” to be back in the EU’s flagship science research programme Horizon after a three-year Brexit lockout, with new data revealing they have been awarded about £500m in grants since re-entry.

As the EU secretly draws up strategies for the next seven-year funding cycle in 2027, the UK is hoping its success in the first 12 months since returning to Horizon will leave it in pole position with Germany and France to dominate European science, despite Brexit.

With projects ranging from the research to develop brain catheters inspired by wasps to efforts to create aviation fuel from yeast and greenhouse gases, the UK has been catapulted to the top of the league of non-EU beneficiaries by number of grants. And, at fifth position behind Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and France, it looks set to resume its overall place in the coming 12 months.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#88749
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... SApp_Other
Keir Starmer’s senior team has been discussing for several weeks how to handle public anger over the policy, which bubbled over in last Thursday’s local elections, when the party lost two-thirds of the council seats it was defending.

While a full reversal of the cut is not expected, No 10 sources said they were considering whether to increase the £11,500 threshold over which pensioners are no longer eligible for the allowance.

Labour MPs have been piling pressure on the government to change its mind over the winter fuel payment, as well as its plans for £5bn benefit cuts, before a vote on “stage one” of its welfare plans in early June.[/quot
e]

My view is that the policy was implemented badly and not communicated clearly. The reaction was in my view, completely over the top and the mass death of pensioners never happened either.
By Youngian
#88755
Former Conservative voters aren't angry at the government for tightening public spending. And neither should the government rush in panic measures or voting for Nigel gets things done.
And maybe start a ferry service so asylum applicants can safely reach British territory, preferably St Helena.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#88758
It’s fixing the wrong issue though. The WFA is one that Reform/Tory voters didn’t like because it affected them directly as the group who didn’t need it but liked having a nice little bonus. Tweaking that is going to make no difference because they’ll still vote reform/tory for all the other reasons they would do that, just with a few more quid.

The benefit cuts affect a much more diverse group who would in many cases usually be more inclined to vote labour because (historically)Labour are the party most likely to not remove support for them and consider their needs. Reconsider them, and you’re potentially winning back actual votes as opposed to fantasy ones you were never getting anyway.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#88759
I see that the WFP is 'under review'.

I personally think that the government was right to means-test it, but to change course now would silence the 'not listening' critics amongst the Guardianistas. The right would have a field day, but it would sound hollow.
By Youngian
#88765
So much for Brexit bonuses and sucking up to Trump.
Surprised this has happened because Trump doesn't give a rat's arse about reciprocation even if it's from a trade bloc of comparable size. And it would drive a wedge between the UK and the EU to prevent realignment.
Britain faces a higher rate of US tariff than the European Union despite Donald Trump’s hatred of Brussels, new analysis shows.

The UK’s effective tariff rate – the average charged on British goods exported to the US – is 11.6pc, compared with 9.5pc for the EU, according to Capital Economics.

British imports also face a higher average rate than Mexico, Canada, India, Thailand and Vietnam.Britain faces a higher rate of US tariff than the European Union despite Donald Trump’s hatred of Brussels, new analysis shows.

The UK’s effective tariff rate – the average charged on British goods exported to the US – is 11.6pc, compared with 9.5pc for the EU, according to Capital Economics.

British imports also face a higher average rate than Mexico, Canada, India, Thailand and Vietnam. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/20 ... -brussels/
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#88767
Crabcakes wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 10:35 am It’s fixing the wrong issue though. The WFA is one that Reform/Tory voters didn’t like because it affected them directly as the group who didn’t need it but liked having a nice little bonus. Tweaking that is going to make no difference because they’ll still vote reform/tory for all the other reasons they would do that, just with a few more quid.

The benefit cuts affect a much more diverse group who would in many cases usually be more inclined to vote labour because (historically)Labour are the party most likely to not remove support for them and consider their needs. Reconsider them, and you’re potentially winning back actual votes as opposed to fantasy ones you were never getting anyway.
It is affecting Labour it keeps coming up when talking to voters.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#88774
That’s a risky road to go down though - making policy/talking points based on what people complain about is what did for Gordon Brown, and reinforces the idea that it was always wrong.

The winter fuel thing has been done, there were no swathes of frozen pensioners, and people who still needed it got it - changing back now would be admitting defeat after you’ve effectively won. The benefit cuts are yet to come in so that’s a different story.
  • 1
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
Labour Government 2024 - ?

That’s a risky road to go down though - maki[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

As someone with little knowledge of Hollywood, I f[…]

Reform Party

Big like.

Labour MPs I'd Like To Hit With A Haddock

Ibis are good, in my experience.