[Tubby Isaacs]

The issue of course is that it's £2.5bn you can't spend on something else- to use one particularly apposite example, paying care workers more.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Here's Jez. He's misquoting Enoch Powell as well. But he's right about care worker shortages.

It's notable how much support Cooper is getting from Labour MPs who you'd think are most vulnerable to a Reform challenge. I thought that was interesting, because the conventional view is that this strategy is a gift to Reform. I think it's worth considering that they have picked something up in their constituencies that there's a political audience for it who doesn't think "Fuck it, Farage will do it properly".

I guess we'll see.

[Youngian]

I'm actually surprised the amount isn't higher. I think there are quite a lot of the public who'd actually pay their share of that in extra tax. Or preferably have other people pay it, of course.

Care workers are paid by the public sector, why would that money vanish because of a lower
wage bill?

[Tubby Isaacs]

Fair point, I tried to shoehorn a clever example in.

[kreuzberger]

For me, Starmer is getting close to Iraq. Last time around, I was able to choke on Eccelstone, as I was with WFA and the nonsensical hysteria being peddled by the tories' broadcast and press mates.

The naked assault on the crips and the forrins is looking to me like I/we misread Starmer. He looked like a thoroughbred in a fine suit but is falling at the second fence in a free one.

[Tubby Isaacs]

The speech is bad enough without the Guardian having to misrepresent it. The "immigrants have done incalculable economic harm" misquote is being widely shared. I just went on to a blog where this was taken up, and I pointed out that he didn't say this. After the second attempt, it was accepted (I think) that I was right, but this was criticized as being (of all things) "literal".

[kreuzberger]

The speech is bad enough without the Guardian having to misrepresent it.

Is there any push-back from Labour comms on this? Or are they too busy, tucking in to the free buffet at the focus groups in Doncaster?

[Youngian]

Starmer doing a blinding job of making his own voters feel like strangers in their own land. Throwing all you have to hang onto Stoke and Hull may cost him dearly in safer Labour seats. I know who won't be electorally downhearted at Starmer joining Badenoch in dancing to Farage’s tune and that's Ed Davey. And the Greens if they get their shit together.

[Tubby Isaacs]

The speech is bad enough without the Guardian having to misrepresent it.

Is there any push-back from Labour comms on this? Or are they too busy, tucking in to the free buffet at the focus groups in Doncaster?

Cooper was clear enough about it. But above all, I think it's reasonable not to expect bullshit from the Guardian.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Starmer is looking like a dud. Cooper does this much better and less contentiously.

This will all settle down to net migration of about 250-350,000 a year. Which is pretty much what would have happened anyway, with (per Sam Freedman) at most 100k difference being made by all the announcements today.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Starmer doing a blinding job of making his own voters feel like strangers in their own land. Throwing all you have to hang onto Stoke and Hull may cost him dearly in safer Labour seats. I know who won't be electorally downhearted at Starmer joining Badenoch in dancing to Farage’s tune and that's Ed Davey. And the Greens if they get their shit together.

Davey's almost achieved cross over with Badenoch in the polls. I don't know how many he can take off Labour where he needs them- the distribution was very efficient before. Can he take them where Labour needs them though?

Wasn't the mood music "Labour's doing OK with these deals" a few days ago?

[The Weeping Angel]

It's probably worth pointing out that rhetoric from Starmer aside, the policies themselves aren't that bad.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cje72plqk17o

Sir Keir Starmer has unveiled Labour's long-awaited plans to cut levels of immigration into the UK.

The prime minister said measures in the white paper, external, a blueprint for future laws, would make the system "controlled, selective and fair".

Here is a summary of the key measures.

[Abernathy]

I think I understand the reasons for the proposals in the White Paper (though I don’t really see that there’s a need to double the residency requirement for citizenship and ending adult social care visas is questionable), but the rhetoric that Starmer has chosen to employ in announcing the proposals is, I think, a rather large political mistake. It won’t satisfy the Farage/Reform crew and their voters, and it has , I sense, dismayed many natural and long-term Labour supporters (a group in which I include myself). I know he has been disingenuously misquoted, but the “nation of strangers” stuff was just too close to the shite Powell was coming out with 50 odd years ago, and easy meat for the Corbynista keyboard social media smartarses. I simply don’t see what there is to be gained from this kind of rhetoric.

Quite disappointing.

[Youngian]

Demand for labour ultimately is the biggest determinant of immigration levels. There's a neat argument among free market wonks that labour shortages result in exorbitant pay demands. Which will concentrate employers' minds to invest in more mechanisation. Creepy Japanese robots coming to a care home near you.