User avatar
By Abernathy
#89101
I always wondered why they had TWO leaders. Why not three? Or four, or five?

Why not just a single leader like every other organisation?

At what number does having multiple leaders begin to look ridiculously absurd ?
mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#89171
More from the populist Zack. It took him quite a few hours to spot this "not even subtle" thing. God I hope he loses really badly.

The Starmer quote is cut off to remove its (very clear) meaning about parallel communities. It's been clarified by ministers since, more than once. That's not at all like the Powell meaning.

  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Sycamore Gap Morons.

Another reason may be that if chummy did get done […]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

I thought it was "blessed are the chees[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I’m a bit disappointed about the Russell Gro[…]

Kemi Badenoch

The Tories want a target apparently I assume it&rs[…]