Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Tue May 13, 2025 8:35 pm
There's a lot of dishonest bollocks going on.
There is indeed. The bits highlighted are making fairly sound points, in a couple of places too strongly. But that's not "reincarnation of `Enoch".
And there's a fairly strong streak of sticking it to business there too for inadequate training and opportunities for British workers. Worth remembering here that British workers aren't all white. I quoted the 1996 statement on Finnish nurses by Diane Abbot, for which she was rightly condemned. But I will grant that she (and Bernie Grant, who backed her up) were probably expressing something felt locally by Black British women, that they weren't getting a fair crack. I would think the same is true of lots of Asian Britons in eg Oldham. There are some plans in the white paper to use carrot and stick to make business train and develop more locally. If that works, that's in effect a tax rise on well off business owners, something we keep hearing Labour should do more of.
My main objection now, on reflection, is the pseudo intellectual rubbish about immigration not having brought growth. They're apparently trying to get the OBR to change its assessment, but it won't. This is quite unnecessary. There are perfectly solid reasons why you might want to reduce immigration around housing and infrastructure.