At least five more MPs decide to vote against England and Wales assisted dying billSubheading (not visible from the front page)
With two others moving to vote in favour, and a previous majority of 55, the bill seems likely to pass next stageWhy is the headline writer/ editor trying to create this impression of a failing bill?
It is not beyond the realm of imagination to consider that a doctor (with or without consultation with the patient; the law gives them extraordinary power) could offer up a shortened life expectancy in order to help, or indeed nudge, a patient along the road to an assisted death. Talk of how much money and resources assisted dying coul.d save the NHS, along with the bill’s weak definition of coercion, only makes this horrific scenario more likelyThere we go. Opponents ask for a financial projection, at first claiming the NHS can't cope with it. Projection produced that there won't be a net cost. Then that's bad too. Let's all spend extra money on extra suffering, eh?
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 12:04 pm Here we go again. Headline.It's the Guardian.
At least five more MPs decide to vote against England and Wales assisted dying billSubheading (not visible from the front page)
With two others moving to vote in favour, and a previous majority of 55, the bill seems likely to pass next stageWhy is the headline writer/ editor trying to create this impression of a failing bill?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... dying-bill
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Wed May 14, 2025 1:28 pm An article against assisted dying.This is truly desperate stuff. Are we really expected to believe the only thing preventing vast numbers of doctors - who *already* literally have the power of life and death over people at their most vulnerable - becoming serial killers is that currently assisted dying isn’t legal, and that the moment it is they’ll switch to become motivated only by the NHS bottom line rather than things like, I dunno, wanting to help people?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... t#comments
This caught my eye.
It is not beyond the realm of imagination to consider that a doctor (with or without consultation with the patient; the law gives them extraordinary power) could offer up a shortened life expectancy in order to help, or indeed nudge, a patient along the road to an assisted death. Talk of how much money and resources assisted dying coul.d save the NHS, along with the bill’s weak definition of coercion, only makes this horrific scenario more likelyThere we go. Opponents ask for a financial projection, at first claiming the NHS can't cope with it. Projection produced that there won't be a net cost. Then that's bad too. Let's all spend extra money on extra suffering, eh?
If doctors are not to be trusted because they'll kill disabled people, where does that leave ordinary members of the public taking them to Dignitas?
It's the anti-abortion arguments in a way. […]