[Crabcakes]

How does one conflate disability with being in the final stage of a terminal illness? Unless they're acting in very bad faith, or are a total moron.

I've read some bollocks in my time, but this really takes the biscuit.

The only answer - assuming that the article wasn’t written by Josef Mengele - is that the person who penned it doesn’t think that at all, but they would very much like you to believe that people who support assisted dying do.

[Tubby Isaacs]

We had an anti-abortionist lecture at my school (we had a decent variety of speakers overall) who pulled a rhetorical trick on us a bit like that. If you thought abortion was ok because of likely severe disability, you logically think disabled people are unworthy.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Polly Toynbee with an inspiring call to MPs to pass a legacy. It's true that issues like this get remembered in the way that votes on regular politics don't.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... government

Toynbee doesn't fuck about.

Meg Hillier, always an anti, wants doctors gagged from mentioning assisted dying, creating a legal minefield to deter doctors from offering help.

At political extremes, Diane Abbott and Edward Leigh write that “the only adequate safeguard is to keep the current law unchanged”. But where are the safeguards against extreme suffering in death?

Denying everyone’s right to escape a torturing death is not the “safe” option. The Inescapable Truth, a report written by palliative care clinicians, reports, “Some will retch at the stench of their own body rotting. Some will vomit their own faeces. Some will suffocate, slowly, inexorably, over several days.” On any day their figures show an average of 17 people are dying these bad deaths: it could be you or me.

I first heard of vomiting one's own faeces BTL on the Guardian the other day. Jesus Christ.

[kreuzberger]

Toynbee is, was, and will always be one of the best of us. You don't need to be 100% on side with her in order to cheer her to the rafters.

[Tubby Isaacs]

Simon Opher, who is a doctor himself, has pointed out that it's the responsibility of doctors to inform patients about all the options they have.

Opponents claiming it's not fair that it's a private members bill rather than a government bill. There would be more discussion time as a government bill, but it isn't one. I'm going to take a wild stab and say that none of the opponents would have come up with an argument that hadn't been made before, ad nauseam. They're also complaining that only 2 amendments were called. On the plus side, the Meg Hillier nonsense wasn't called.

Majority of 49, so there's not been any significant move against, despite some suggestions that was happening.

[Abernathy]

That's quite encouraging. It’s now likely that the third reading of the bill will be in June.

If it then is agreed by the other place and royal assent goes ahead, people will have a real, compassionate and humane choice.

[Abernathy]

Encouraged that 605 MPs were there on a Friday to vote on a Private Member’s Bill. A refection of how important this business is.

Very disappointed that my own inadequate MP, Tahir Ali, voted against the bill again. If the opportunity to deselect the bugger were to come along (it won’t), I’d be strongly inclined to get shot of the useless tosser.

[davidjay]

Encouraged that 605 MPs were there on a Friday to support a Private Member’s Bill. A refection of how important this business is.

Very disappointed that my own inadequate MP, Tahir Ali, voted against the bill again. If the opportunity to deselect the bugger were to come along (it won’t), I’d be strongly inclined to get shot of the useless tosser.

Useless he may be, but I wouldn't criticise any MPs's sincerely-held belief on this matter.

[Abernathy]

Encouraged that 605 MPs were there on a Friday to support a Private Member’s Bill. A refection of how important this business is.

Very disappointed that my own inadequate MP, Tahir Ali, voted against the bill again. If the opportunity to deselect the bugger were to come along (it won’t), I’d be strongly inclined to get shot of the useless tosser.

Useless he may be, but I wouldn't criticise any MPs's sincerely-held belief on this matter.

Yeah, fair point, I suppose. It is an un-whipped Private Member’s Bill after all. But I don’t want my MP to decide on the basis of a sincerely held belief, particularly if that belief is based on religious dogma. I want consideration, rationality, logic, compassion, and humanity. I’m afraid that, having corresponded with Tahir on this, I’m not convinced that that’s what he has delivered.