By Oboogie
#92214
Crabcakes wrote: Fri Jul 04, 2025 5:00 pm
Crabcakes wrote: Fri Jul 04, 2025 2:03 pm
kreuzberger wrote: Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:37 pm

I think that that's her raisin d'être ...
The best bit of this is that it was entirely unintentional as I posted from my phone so was the victim/beneficiary of an autocorrect 😄
Hang on, I bamboozled myself here. I thought Sultana wasn’t her surname and I’d messed up at not catching an autocorrect, but it *is* her surname so I was OK anyway!

I blame Starmer or something.
I did wonder, I checked your post three times but couldn't see what was wrong with it.

t took me a long time to learn that her surname doesn't start with a Z. I think I may have been influenced by her being Zarah rather than Sarah but mainly I just couldn't believe it really was Sultana.
By mattomac
#92220
The problem I have with this and it’s already rearing its head is the party will stand for everything I believe in type nonsense.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#92225
At least you can see why Jez had the sense not to start a party himself sooner. He knew full well not even his best mates would join.
  • 1
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18

Every single one of his cultural references are at[…]

Trot Watch

At least you can see why Jez had the sense not to […]

Guardian

I suspect few will read this Marina Hyde column wi[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Lewis Goodall has thoughts. https://goodallandgoo[…]