#85915
because he (Trump) knows in the end he can't betray the legacy of Ronald Reagan. He can't allow a new Iron Curtain to descend on eastern Europe, and a new Russian 'sphere of influence

It's was EU and NATO expansion responsible for Russian military escapades, according to a leading Conservative politician setting out his stall in 2016. Boris someone.
#86204
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... on_desktop

Johnson on the causes of Covid - it was the Chinese. In a lab. And all the scientists got together and made up a story about wet markets because a) they didn't want their funding cut off, and b) they didn't want to be seen as racist towards the Chinese.

So, umm, they made up a story about those weird eastern fellows and their propensity for doing strange things with animals...right?

While casually diverting attention from his own inaction (by February 2020 we knew that Covid was not a "Chinese phenomenon") and smearing "the scientists", as the Covid enquiry rolls on.

Mendacious cunt.
#86538
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... on_desktop

Johnson's on another holiday, this time in the arse end of Texas. It's empty and he's wondering why. Is it because much of America is sparsely populated and very big? No, it's because of their godawful employment laws, er sorry, I mean great work ethic.

After a quick rundown of how harsh the US is and how cossetted us Europeans are, he comes to a conclusion. The Americans are right.
Long after the end of the Cold War, the US is still spending way over $100billion a year just on keeping forces and missiles in Europe – and the American voter has noticed.
Indeed, wanker. And you know why? Because the USSR went away and something took its place.
My point is not that one system is morally or socially or economically better than another – though I am sure readers will have their views. For driving thrift, enterprise, innovation and wealth creation the American way is currently astonishing and triumphant – with the poorest parts of Mississippi now on a par with France.
While making it very clear which one he prefers.

Cunt.

And yeah, him - him - lecturing us on freeloading? Fuck off.
#86906
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... l-Pot.html

Johnson goes TV critic, deciding that Adolescence is a load of crap because it's about a white kid and ingrained sexism which according to him, doesn't exist. And a better drama would be about chucking black kids in jail.

All Starmer's fault because he's shutting the private schools and insisting on "all must have prizes" (whatever the fuck that means) and they don't teach Latin any more and they've banned Baa Baa Black Sheep...

Fucking bag of cunt flavoured lard.
#86918
all must have prizes" (whatever the fuck that means)
All Must Have Prizes was a polemic by Melanie Phillips written in 1996, when well known radical leftist John Major was in Government. Never read it but the title seems to suggest that the system was too focussed on making everyone feel good rather than stretching the people who should have got the prizes (probably people like Melanie).

Bozo's never had much interest in state education and presumably thinks that some mild reforms to academies and not having a special fund earmarked for Latin means that the 1983 ILEA are back in charge, though some of that stuff on equalities has worn pretty well.
davidjay liked this
#86920
Johnson appears to be attacking 'Adolescence' simply because Starmer praised it. Just more lazy journalism from a bloke who is too lazy to do any proper research to come up with an original article. Given how long it takes to write and pitch a TV idea and get the programme made the drama was probably set when Johnson was PM.
davidjay liked this
#87507
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... heese.html

Cheese. Why Americans need to eat more British cheese, and why Brits need to eat more chlorinated chicken. And why all of this will put two fingers up to the Chinese and the great white Anglosphere coalition can rule the world, as soon as we slap Johnny Kung Fu Twankey down a bit.

Cunt.
#87875
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... on_desktop

He gets paid for this bollocks. Those phones, eh? What's all that about? Me, I'm a total klutz with them. Remember that time Laura K forwarded me all her soft soap - erm, I mean hard hitting and perceptive - questions? Well, I thought she was just being polite, because apparently that's what journalists do in my head. Anyway, we had all these Whatsapp groups, couldn't keep track of a thing, forget me own head next, nobody told me, big boys did it and ran away, anyway did you hear about Govey's ex? Tried to organise a book launch and nobody turned up! Still, enough about me and my skiing holidays and all that. It's all the kids' fault, being all boring and that!
#88201
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-ma ... G5wFznt6tH

Johnson really is in a bind. His 'brand', if he has any, is the promotion of Ukraine and its cause. But he also wants desperately to suck up to Trump. So another column of "any minute now, Don'll let Ivan have it with all barrels!", as he desperately tries to convince people that he has any insight or influence at all.
#92708
Anyone been wondering what the custard cunt has been up to? No, didn't expect you had. But here it is anyway:

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... on_desktop

Standard "One year of Labour" hatchet piece. Starmer's apparently selling out the NHS, abandoning Ukraine, taxing education, and being the closest thing we've ever had to a commie.

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... on_desktop

Bollocks about Macron and migration.
Remember that before Brexit we were obliged by basic EU law to treat every one of the 520 million EU nationals as if they were British citizens, for the purposes of migration to this country. It was insane. Brexit took back full legal control.

Count the numbers that have been coming in, more than 40 per cent up on last year – tens of thousands of illegal aliens scrambling ashore and burying themselves in the crevices of our society

We can, if we choose, have absolutely zero legal migration to this country – zero.
Right. Those 520 million people had legal and safe routes into the country. The people taking boats over are a) not EU citizens, and b) thanks to you and Patel and Braverman, don't have any legal routes. So whatever you're arguing is patent bollocks.
He saw what happened, for instance, when we diverged from the EU regulatory framework and achieved the fastest Covid vaccine roll-out in Europe, followed by the fastest exit from lockdown.
HIghest death toll too, but let's concentrate on the wins. Although "first to dump all the protection that was inconveniencing us" isn't exactly much to be proud of. Still, dead wood and that holding us back, eh?

There's also a thing about him doing the parents' sack race at one of his brood's schools. Uses it as an opportunity to whinge about billionaires running off to Dubai and tax on private schools, and the all must win prizes mentality and Labour hate sport and I was mayor during the Olympics dontcha know?, before descending into sub-Wodehouse shit about "the honour of the Johnsons was at stake", in which he cheats at the race and still loses anyway, but still writes it up as a win because he "does well in the sack". Fails to explain how cheating, fucking up, and looking a tit translate to maintaining family honour (and come on, it's the FUCKING JOHNSONS we're talking about), unless at the end of it all he goes up to the other dads, points at Carrie, and says "Yeah, but I'm shagging that". Which wouldn't surprise me, actually.

What's quite apparent is his obsession with dominance and submission, especially in the use of sexual imagery and public displays. Starmer like a terrified supply teacher beset by St Trinians-style children, Macron being humiliated in public by his spank-happy wife. Britain as Brussels's bitch. Private single sex school has a lot to answer for.
#92710
Remember that before Brexit we were obliged by basic EU law to treat every one of the 520 million EU nationals as if they were British citizens, for the purposes of migration to this country.
It was called exercising treaty rights, and as I've argued before, technically speaking, those EU nationals exercising mutual treaty rights of free movement within the EU were not immigrants at all, and those mutual treaty rights applied to 60 million UK citizens too, many of whom exercised their right to live, work, and pay taxes in other EU states. So "for the purposes of migration to this country" is yet another brazen lie.

Cunt.
Spoonman liked this
#92711
I remember back in the day, a letter to Viz going "The problem with the Channel Tunnel is that sooner or later the French will want to use it."

That seems to be the basic attitude Johnson's fans have.
  • 1
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18

I remember back in the day, a letter to Viz goin[…]

Guardian

A lot of heritage railways are no longer running s[…]

The BBC

And yet, there's always one... from Digital S[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

And Democrats, don’t feel too self-righteou[…]