Top story.
Labour does not deserve to win next election without change, Reeves says
Chancellor admits voter frustration as government faces renewed calls from Labour politicians for a wealth tax
The Guardian really doesn't like Rachel Reeves. Every other article seems to be framed in terms of Reeves blocking their favourite solution, a wealth tax. You could equally frame her period in office with fairly large increases in spending, investment and borrowing. But they've decided the clicks are with making Reeves sound like Ronald Reagan.
Just in case you were thinking she was actually struggling well with difficult circumstances, there's this, as the third story.
Chancellor’s attempt to intervene in car finance scandal branded ‘disgraceful’
Defending industry over consumers sends ‘really bad message’, says Treasury committee member Bobby Dean
The intervention didn't happen, because the Supreme Court decision wasn't as damaging to the car leasing industry as it might have been. But the Guardian reported Reeves might have intervened, and here's a Lib Dem MP to keep the story alive.
It might or might not have been disgraceful if it happened, but it didn't. And given the stuff we were told was definitely happening (watering down the workers rights bill, for instance) I'm not taking on trust that it would have. Aren't there stronger stories than this?