User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#93868
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:03 am Why do people post on politics in foreign countries they know nothing about? That guy knows about as much about Britain as I do about New Zealand.
I've seen quite a few Britons say similarly idiotic things about America. What bothers me is that, considering all the problems the Democrats have had, they'd be more understanding of the problems Labour is facing. As for not knowing about Britain.

Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#93971
This is the news God, I wish it wasn't.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yp8l3z0g5o
Ex-Superman actor Dean Cain has announced he is planning to join the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, known as ICE.

In an interview on Wednesday, Cain, who is already a sworn law enforcement officer, said, "I will be sworn in as an ICE agent asap".

It comes after he released a video encouraging members of the public to join following a recruitment drive by the agency, which is behind the Trump administration's ramped-up deportation scheme.

Cain played the role of Superman between 1993 and 1997 in the TV series, Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman.

He has gone on to star in a number of other films and TV shows, and has also directed.

In late July, ICE announced it was aiming to recruit an additional 10,000 new personnel, doubling the agency's headcount as it ramps up deportations across the country.

It is specifically hoping to recruit deportation officers, along with attorneys, criminal investigators, student visa adjudicators and other roles.

Speaking on Fox News on Wednesday, Cain said: "I put out a recruitment video yesterday - I'm actually a sworn deputy sheriff and a reserve police officer - I wasn't part of ICE, but once I put that out there and you put a little blurb on your show, it went crazy".

"So now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent asap."
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#93985
Interesting to note that over the years the Superman franchise has kept up a pretty good tradition of slotting players in earlier films and series into the current one, usually in jokey cameos.

They've never had Cain back.

Indeed, a glance at his IMDB profile shows a career made mostly of shit for the religious right.
By satnav
#93993
At the moment Trump is able to chalk ICE up has a success because they are deporting large numbers of immigrants but how will the policy pan out in the long term? All the countries that border the US are basically forced to take in the deported immigrants because if they don't Trump will hit them with high tariffs but eventually these deportations will reach a tipping point in many countries. What are all these immigrants going to do when they return to their own country's? Will they just take it on the chin and settled down or are they likely to try and get back across the border. There is bound to be a negative impact on law and order in these countries leading to political instability.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#93996
Option 3 - wait for them to die and bury their bodies in the swamp.

We have to get past this "Trump is screwed if he plays by the rules at any point" thinking. Not specifically you, Satnav. All of us.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#94112
Who are the least successful Left in the world? I don't know, but the US Left must come pretty close. Of course, there are big structural handicaps in the US at Federal level, with gerrymandering being endemic and all the small Conservative states in the Senate, but you'd expect, I dunno, a few progressives winning city elections, and building impressive public transport. Seems like it ought to be possible to do that, even with establishment money going against you, because turnout is generally wretched. If Ellie Chowns can get North Herefordshire to vote Green, can't a bunch of progressives get a city to vote for them?

Nevertheless, the sort of people who brought you "defund the police", the worst political slogan of all time which was still losing elections 4 years on, keep popping up telling everyone how to do it. And how to do it, incredibly, involves doing it like them, which the Democrats have never thought of.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... feat-trump
Progressive economic reforms – from raising the federal minimum wage and implementing a federal jobs guarantee to expanding social security, taxing the rich, and investing in public goods such as education and infrastructure – are supported not only by Democratic-leaning voters but also by substantial segments of Donald Trump’s base
Infrastructure. Shame nobody suggested that to Joe Biden. Do those Trump voters really care about taxing the rich? They happily vote in people who are very open about doing the absolute opposite. Unlike with Farage here, who's never really had a campaign where his tax positions are to the fore, Trump's positions have been extremely clear. Education is mostly a state thing. Again, politicians who are very clear about doing the opposite to investing regularly romp home.

Expanding social security (what we call pensions) is seriously expensive. Pretty quickly you run against the same problem as here- are the rich really funding all that? Pretty soon, you have to level with the voters, and that's an angle for Republicans. Democrats putting your taxes up.

There follow some cherrypicked examples of people doing it their way and winning. Well, sort of. Exhibit A, Zohran Mamdani hasn't won over any Trump voters yet, because he's only won a Democratic primary in... NYC. Get back to me when someone like him wins a Senate seat in North Carolina. Talking of which, the neither young nor particularly progressively-styled Roy Cooper looks a good bet to do that. I wish both of them luck, but maybe different places are different,

Then there's a second example.
In Nebraska, independent union leader Dan Osborn – a mechanic and labor activist – ran on a tight platform of workers’ rights and corporate accountability and over-performed Kamala Harris by 14 points in a deep-red state.
And indeed he did. But they're also not telling us something. He ran as a social conservative. He supports Trump's wall, and opposes gun control. Again, I wish him luck but different places are different. And what's a "tight platform" anyway? You think Osborn-Trump voters thought Kamala Harris was too rightwing on economics, or they didn't want her coming after their guns and being too nice to illegal immigrants? Surely the latter was also a factor. Again, good luck to Dan Osborn (he's running for the other senate seat in 2026) but let's be honest about what "populism" is and isn't in rural Nebraska and other places.

And some others.
In Pennsylvania’s 17th district, Chris Deluzio, a representative and navy veteran, champions “economic patriotism”, calling out economic elites and damaging trade agreements while pushing to rebuild domestic industry and strengthen labor rights
Rebuilding domestic industry- shit, Joe Biden should have thought of that. The Republicans just lied that they'd been the ones to bring that investment. Navy veteran? Well, it's not like the Democrats haven't run those before.

I find the "America fucked up by trade agreements" narrative no more convincing from Bernie Sanders than Trump. And it seems to go with a bizarre sense that Americans are all living in shacks in Appalachia. Of course, inequality is terrible but that doesn't mean everyone's doing badly. Living standards improved slightly over Biden's term, which had the far from normal Covid hit, and the US is on a long boom overall. The US is doing well, but can't be arsed to solve the problems it has. But as I always say, good luck to this guy he might be a good fit in his district.

In fact, good luck to all these guys, I'd vote for them. I'd also vote for Roy Cooper and the many counter examples of people who won by styling themselves as bipartisan. I just don't think these articles tell us that much.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#94117
The Weeping Angel wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 8:49 pm
I've seen quite a few Britons say similarly idiotic things about America. What bothers me is that, considering all the problems the Democrats have had, they'd be more understanding of the problems Labour is facing. As for not knowing about Britain.
That's nothing to do with taxes going up and the economy slowing then. Starmer just opens up safe refugees routes and he's back ahead. That's good to know.
  • 1
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164

What my missus can't get her head around is h[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Something of which I have personal experience. ht[…]

Over in America...

I've seen quite a few Britons say similarl[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Правда But nowadays, we have alternative facts to[…]