- Tue Aug 12, 2025 11:01 am
#94249
That priceless Ming vase would have shattered into a thousand pieces by now.
Crabcakes wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:25 amMostly true, I would say two things: 1. A vast majority of those protesting hadn't heard of Palestine Action before now, and 2. Think they're XR but for Palestine.Abernathy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:04 pm100% this. When you have the former base commander of Greenham Common saying this is too much, I think it’s clear it’s too much. It’s absurdly heavy handed, it feeds all manner of theories about donations from Israel-friendly groups to cabinet ministers, and it plays perfectly into the tiresome narrative that Starmer’s Labour are no better than, if not worse, than the Tories. And on this particular issue, there’s depressingly more than a grain of truth to that.
That is undoubtedly so, but the proscription of a direct-action protest group as terrorist is, I think I’m right in saying, completely without precedent. I rather think it is this that has put a lot of people’s backs up - hence the demo today.
I also find it slightly baffling. What exactly are Yvette Cooper, and Keir Starmer, trying to prove or achieve ? Causing several million quid’s worth of damage to state assets is a very serious criminal matter- without a doubt, in penalty for which the full force of the law should be brought to bear. But terrorism ? They were not, and are not, trying to kill anybody or terrorise anybody.
If it’s possible for Yvette and Keir to back down from this action with a shred of credibility and dignity, then they should do so ASAP.
It’s a gift to the right as it shifts the Overton window yet again, it’s a gift to the left and Corbyn’s start-up as it disenfranchises Labour voters, and - above all else - it’s *wrong*. Other protest groups have done far more for far longer with no action remotely like this.
That is undoubtedly so, but the proscription […]