Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Fri Aug 15, 2025 1:53 pm
Today's cross party alliance of "everything's going to shit" have alighted on data centers. I can't claim to know much about these but I'm guessing that it's at least possible that we don't forget to provide extra electricity and water capacity. A lot of them are in the home counties, but one is also due in Newport, Gwent and the biggest of all is due in Blyth, Northumberland.
I read the article and 90% of it is the sort of bollocks you hear from "non technical managers".
File alongside "why don't we just use bigger batteries".
I am puzzled that any sane business considers locating such large installations close to the land-price gravity well that is London.
If you'd like to save a few scheckels on cooling, bits of Northern England, Wales and Scotland are available at far lower cost.
There are arguments to be had about economy of scale Vs having a massive energy (and water?) sink in one location.
The present IT model favours a handful of massive locations for public cloud services.
New use will increase energy draw, and AI is a big culprit here..
Mid size businesses switching their computing to cloud will decommission far less efficient in-house setups..
It's the end of my job (unless I want to serve as an underpaid cable changer for a billionaire).
But it's very difficult to argue against the logic of adopting the cloud for most IT applications.
I believe water is the same red herring / fallacy we see in "It takes 400 gallons of water to grow an almond".