User avatar
By kreuzberger
#95438
If any of these young, fit, fighting-age doctors, engineers, and scientists want to get a burner phone and a doppelgänger-ID ("they all look the same") for a gig with Deliveroo, I am pretty sure that they have the wherewithal.

This is Farage-flavoured, performative bullshit which will have absolutely zero effect on Channel crossings or the voting intentions of the criminal creosote cretins. Economic growth? Possibly.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#95440
kreuzberger wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:46 pm
This is Farage-flavoured, performative bullshit which will have absolutely zero effect on Channel crossings or the voting intentions of the criminal creosote cretins. Economic growth? Possibly.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... ation-deal

Probably bad for economic growth. But it's likely not performative. See here from Kiran Stacey

Governments have been trying to sign a returns agreement with France for several years to reduce the number of small boats crossing the Channel, though with little success.

Conservative ministers from the previous government say they got close to agreeing one but that the French government remained concerned about how the UK’s shadow economy could attract migrants to work illegally in Britain.
Just his reading of events, but I'm inclined to take it seriously because the stuff about cracking down on Deliveroo came at the same time as the deal was announced.

We don't know if the deal, and other work on people smuggling, will work yet, of course.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#95444
This sounds good. And nice of Warren to keep my spirits up.

This is where rail nationalisation should be good, though the work for this will predate it. Much easier for the centre/ minister to drive these things forward across the whole system, instead of train companies doing their own thing. Apparently some lines in Wales already have this. It would be like Oyster PAYG but for national rail. My guess is that passengers will like it, and perhaps it could boost numbers at the margins.

User avatar
By kreuzberger
#95445
Apart from being in possession of an undesirable skin colour, what in the name of Russ Abbott and all the Luton 1985 League Cup winning team has this to do with newly-qualified rocket scientists?

However we skin this cat, it all boils down to rabid racism which, rather than being rightly condemned as a criminal mindset, is being legitimised by the desperately disappointing Ms. Cooper and her flag fetish fantasies.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#95449
I'm not having a pop; I am merely asking you to consider what I wrote with a degree of sarcasm, intended to disassociate overseas students from so-called grey economy "illegals";
If any of these young, fit, fighting-age doctors, engineers, and scientists want to get a burner phone and a doppelgänger-ID ("they all look the same") for a gig with Deliveroo, I am pretty sure that they have the wherewithal.
If, on the other hand, you are saying that Cooper has an anointed right - Labour innit - to lump them all in to a homogenous forrin mass, then, yeah, I am having a pop.

(Mate; she is fellating someone else's voters, not reflecting the values those who swept her into office on a tide of fairness-fuelled hope and goodwill.)
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#95482
Budget November 26th, Which either means she's waiting for something to turn up, working on something massively radical that'll need a lot of time to model, or going to announce some cuts before then. Perhaps they'll redo the PIP cuts, which were far too drastic before but hard to say there isn't a problem with the expanding budget. I thought the idea of having different terms for new sign ups was OK, but that was rejected by backbenchers out of hand.
  • 1
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
Nargle Fargle

Someone's got FauxRage's number :lol: […]

Farage's Flagwankers

Meanwhile; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgr[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

So mostly a proof of life exercise while the[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I thought budgets were normally in October.