User avatar
By Abernathy
#99454
Summat and nowt. AI-generated planning objections are no more likely to succeed than conventional ones. Why should they be?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99456
The Guardian is limbering up for a big stance against the planning bill, as part of its shift to supporting the Lib Dems and the Greens.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#99457
You could use it to flood the system, overload it in denial of service style.

As for these 2 utter Kents, given many mosques don't massively alter the outside of their buildings (mainly to avoid drawing the attention of fucknuckles like we have here), I'm guessing their objections aren't around their light being blocked.
User avatar
By Boiler
#99460
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 12:39 pm Oh god.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... perts-warn
The government’s plan to use artificial intelligence to accelerate planning for new homes may be about to hit an unexpected roadblock: AI-powered nimbyism.
A new service called Objector is offering “policy-backed objections in minutes” to people who are upset about planning applications near their homes.

It uses generative AI to scan planning applications and check for grounds for objection, ranking these as “high”, “medium” or “low” impact. It then automatically creates objection letters, AI-written speeches to deliver to the planning committees, and even AI-generated videos to “influence councillors”.

Kent residents Hannah and Paul George designed the system after estimating they spent hundreds of hours attempting to navigate the planning process when they opposed plans to convert a building near their home into a mosque.
I'm sure that their objections were completely reasonable and motivated by not wanting a load of muslims near their house.
It happened near where a friend lives in Bromley. The main objection wasn't the people, but the surrounding residential streets getting clogged up with the worshipper's parked vehicles.
By davidjay
#99462
No offence to your friend, but I'm getting strong "Don't mind moderate Muslims" vibes there.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#99465
Andy McDandy wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:28 pm You could use it to flood the system, overload it in denial of service style.

As for these 2 utter Kents, given many mosques don't massively alter the outside of their buildings (mainly to avoid drawing the attention of fucknuckles like we have here), I'm guessing their objections aren't around their light being blocked.
That's pretty much my fear as well. Flood the system so nothing gets built. The guardian will probably give them a column,
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Boiler
#99479
davidjay wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 3:03 pm No offence to your friend, but I'm getting strong "Don't mind moderate Muslims" vibes there.
Oh, he didn't give a tinker's cuss about it. It was his neighbours who raised the objections and I do have to say, negotiating the roads near both where he lived and said mosque was a pretty good test of one's driving skills around the time of Friday prayers. One set of neighbours did actually sell up and move.
By satnav
#99611
The Mail has today provided us with a picture of what Nimbies look like.

Image

Residents' fury over plans to build 20,000 new homes on countryside that inspired Jane Austen
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99614
Alex Perry, 55, who has lived in Neatham for 11 years, says the plans would ruin his back garden views of the rolling chalk downs.

The dad-of-three said: 'They are going to destroy some of the most beautiful countryside in southern England.

'There has been no attempt to do any of the accompanying infrastructure. We have already got sewage spills and month long waits just to get an appointment at doctors' surgeries.

'It is the land that informed Jane Austen who she was. If you read her books, it is full of descriptions of this landscape.

'This land is our identity. It is the essence of who we are, and they are planning to concrete it. That is why people are so upset.'
Alas, no space to tell us what Mr Perry does for a living. What's the betting it's not something closely connected to the land? Was his house there when Jane Austen was about?

A nice sighting of "they haven't put any infrastructure in" too. That wouldn't make a lot of sense seeing there's no immediate prospect of new houses. Like you'd expect a Post Office and Primary School to be sat there waiting or something.

I'm calling nonsense on the "takes a month to get a doctor's appointment too". I bet you can fill in a triage form every morning, and in most cases get seen or phoned back.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#99617
You paid thru'pence for your Dale, Trossach, or Cotswold, and your kids want somewhere to live? Down with that sort of thing!
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#99652
Where does he think the people in these new houses will come from? Outer Space? They're in the country now, except in less convenient, smaller and shittier houses, with the same issues around doctors appointments. Perhaps we could provide these people with somewhere better for them, and adjust GP provision accordingly? Who knows, some of them might have kids, who could make your typical "lovely village school" less of a public money pit.
By Youngian
#99660
Among the housing experts coming up on my YouTube feed with totally different narratives was a guy predicting a housing surplus and prices tumbling as babyboomers pass away. Superficially logical.
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Lucky that farms are doing so well. https://bsky.[…]

The BBC

Apologies for reminding everyone of the existence […]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

If it's not that, they're moaning about […]

Kemi Badenoch

I assume he is the kind of person who could walk p[…]