Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Abernathy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 9:26 am
But of course, that's largely bollocks. My neighbour was rendered blind and nearly deaf by virulent meningitis a few years ago. He cannot drive the car he is provided with under the Motability scheme, so he relies on his full-time carer to drive him around in it, but the reality is that she and her family use it far more than he does. But so fucking what ?

From what I remember of looking into Motability, what you describe is perfectly acceptable. And, once again - they're not a 'free' car. You sacrifice benefits for one. I knew someone who was the Motability agent in a Mercedes dealership.

https://www.motability.co.uk/get-suppor ... -eligible/

The other cuntery - apart from resentment - I see around Motability seems to come from individuals who say "never buy one secondhand, they're not looked after 'cos they're free hur hur" or who have some perverse, nostalgic desire for the return of the single-seater Invacar - those little blue cars made of fibreglass with minimal crash resistance.

Perhaps these cunts so envious of Motability vehicles would like to acquire the disabilities that would enable them to qualify for one?

Wow. Just when you think he can go no lower...

If he wrote that article about any other protected characteristic it would be classed as a hate crime. Ableist language seems to get a pass.

EDIT TO ADD

Looks like he would get a free pass from IPSO as he is noting attacking an individual. Tarring all people with the same brush is fine and dandy.

Clause 12 – Discrimination

i) The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual’s race, colour, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability.

ii) Details of an individual’s race, colour, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, physical or mental illness or disability must be avoided unless genuinely relevant to the story.

We can take forward complaints under Clauses 2–16 of the Code from anyone directly affected by editorial material or a journalist’s behaviour (or, with their permission, a representative like a family member, solicitor, or trusted friend). Complaints made under these clauses by people with no connection to a possible breach of the Editors’ Code are known as ‘third party’ complaints and our regulations do not allow us to take these forward.

That was so poorly-written I only got a couple of paragraphs in before having to bale. It didn't turn into Tolstoy later on, did it?

Yes, Tolstoy on a Taxpayer funded Toyota

Yes, if you mean Dave Tolstoy, noted alfresco cider connoisseur of independent means and a constantly on the go lifestyle.

He seems to have a very odd bugbear.

Problem is it’s such a little covered area that his wankspittle readers will take it as gospel and unlike some other things this won’t get debunked as much.

Every single one of his cultural references are at least thirty years old. Always. Ian Dury would have despised him and no-one's written about yuppies this century.

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... usted.html

Lefties don't like Trump, big fucking crybabies the lot of them. Like it or not, he's the boss and we have to grovel to him.

The notion that while can dislike the man, you must respect the office is alien to them.

The man who has turned the office into a grift, slapped his logo over the national regalia, used his office to pursue personal vendettas, spent a lot of time (but none of his own money) playing golf, and is so fucking capricious it's hard to keep up with what's going on?

Former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were both invited to address Parliament, to great acclaim. Neither were great friends of Britain. Clinton, like Biden, was sympathetic to the IRA and helped broker the Long Good Friday surrender agreement.

Obama harboured irrational grudges about Britain’s alleged treatment of his African ancestors and removed Winston Churchill’s bust from the Oval Office. Yet both were received rapturously by star-stuck MPs.

So they acknowledged those presidents' issues with Britain but received them respectfully, right? And you're aware that "the MPs" roll call and political make-up has changed over time?

Right, before just fucking right off, let's just sort a few things out. The GFA wasn't a "surrender deal", it was an attempt to stop people fucking killing each other, and to get everyone to recognise a few home truths. The republican movement did/does not start and end with the PIRA. Yes, we can guess you're very much of the Norman Tebbit "Why don't we just send the SAS in to assassinate all the IRA leaders?" approach, a reversion to cowed and terrified Catholic communities, and Northern Ireland safely ignored once again, but the people directly involved decided something different. So fuck off.

As for Obama, hmm. Why do you bring up his "African ancestors"? Indeed, don't we all have "African ancestors" if you go back far enough? Alleged treatment - well, here's a quote by a colonist in Kenya back in the days (by which I mean the 1950s):

Once I went personally to drop off one gang member who needed special treatment. I stayed for a few hours to help the boys out, softening him up. Things got a little out of hand. By the time I cut his balls off, he had no ears, and his eyeball, the right one, I think, was hanging out of its socket. Too bad, he died before we got much out of him.

That's a settler. Not a police officer, not a soldier or intelligence agent. A fucking farmer.

The British government denies responsibility for what happened, saying it was to doing of the colonial administration, which no longer exists. All down to those gin-sodden old coasters giving the natives a good sjambokking for not pouring their sundowners right. But let's agree that those responsible were fucking white, shall we?

Littlejohn is still a cunt. He has to acknowledge the deep disturbance his American friend causes, but apparently any protest or complaint is childish tantrum throwing. Better to just bend over and take it. See comments on the Johnson thread, made yesterday, for comparison.

You're reading too much into that. It really is nothing more than playground 'my side is winning' nerr-nerring. You don't have to refute his 'points' because the are none. None that are made, or need to be taken seriously, at least.

I know quite a few people who view the GFA as a "surrender", sadly. Some of them go even further but seem oblivious to the fact they wouldn't be the ones in the black and silver uniforms, but actually in the pyjamas with the pink triangles sewn in.

It's invariably the "Tow it out and sink it" mob who see the GFA as a surrender. They, of course, never had to go to work by a different route every day.

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... -Jack.html

Union Jack dress, myth of the far right, fear of being British, all teachers are lefties, can't celebrate our culture, burn down one hotel and they call you a racist, fuck the Afghans, they're all rapists or terrorists anyway, Boris spoke for us all, Emily Thornberry shat on an England flag and posted it all over the internet and they gave HER a bloody gong, nobody listens to the average person, that enough cunting for one day, boss?

Littlejohn does of course understand treaties are domestic law. But reckons his dunderhead readers won't. He reckons right.

International treaties must always take precedence over domestic law.

He's doing Orgreave...

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... grave.html

It’s yet another excuse to dance on Mrs Thatcher’s grave and undermine confidence in the forces of law and order. The ‘truth’ won’t come into it.

This will be just the latest multi-million-pound show trial, along with the long-running Bloody Sunday circus – nothing to do with the IRA, guv – and the current Covid Inquiry, set up to find Boris to blame for absolutely everything.

So, a nice and balanced assessment, then?

It wasn’t pretty. Police charging on horseback and pickets hurling rocks made for almost medieval scenes. But the police didn’t start it. The blame was entirely down to Scargill, a revolutionary Communist who thought he could prevail through violence.

Yes, decent people were caught up in the mayhem. And, yes, the tendency of South Yorkshire Police to fabricate evidence, and whose credibility was destroyed by their Hillsborough lies, led to the collapse of a number of trials.

None of this, however, should detract from who bears the responsibility. That alone lies with Scargill.

So, yes, Scargill "started it" in the sense that he called the strike. But as for who moved first on the day?

Anyway, more of the same, as he comes to the predictable conclusion that the coppers (and armed forces) should be allowed to do whatever they like, especially when it comes to putting the boot in. And that anything goes when you're dealing with people protesting against a 'democratically elected government'. Except Labour ones, obviously.

Cunt.

Funny how some white, working class lads and lassies deserve it, but those in Southport and Epping are simply concerned parents

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... untry.html

Epping. Cozzers are all lefties. Not the rank and file, obviously. They're salt of the Earth (and we'd better get them tooled up to knock the hairies about while we're at it) but the top brass. I mean, look at those police laughing and joking with ER and BLM protesters, and attending Pride parades. They're forced to do it.

Anyway, look at these fuckers exercising their right to protest, by counter-protesting these other fuckers exercising their right to protest. Can't have that, should be only one allowed. First come, first served.

Stand Up To Racism is a Socialist Workers Party front funded by Far Left trades unions, intent on provoking a violent reaction from those who object legitimately to illegal migrants, almost always single men, being bussed in to their communities in the dead of night and billeted in four-star hotels.

The Epping protests erupted after an Ethiopian migrant, who had only arrived on a small boat eight days earlier, was charged with sexually assaulting a young girl.

The correct police response would have been to turn back the SWP mob before they got to within a mile of the locals. When the inevitable confrontation kicked off and the Far Left agitators found themselves outnumbered they were spirited away from the scene in police vans ‘for their own safety’.

Far left, front organisation, provoking, mob, agitators. Contrast with legitimately, locals, all pushing the "not racist, just concerned" line.

He creams his y-fronts at the prospect of uniformed Plod laying into protesters, almost waxing lyrical about it on Tuesday. Today he whines about the police being biased (but oddly, not) and not opening enough lefty heads.

On Tuesday he said the police were right to enforce the will of an elected government. If this government's plan is to label its enemies as far-right and sling them in jail, what's his problem here?

Oh yes, because he's a cunt.

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... demic.html

Slow news week. WFH. Mental Elf. Sicknote culture. Hobnobs and Bargain Hunt. Public sector skivers. Militant junior doctors. Bins not being emptied. Shit nicknames with a whiff of misogyny. Random numbers going up. Knock some heads together. Knock some sense into 'em. Cunt.

Indeed a slow news week.

Yet everywhere you look, from the junior doctors to the Birmingham binmen, half the country seems to be on strike

I'm not say bashing out clichéd bollocks for a half mill a year in the Florida sunshine is a panacea for mental elf deterioration but a good place to mask it. Then shit on others who are broke and not coping.

Was away for the weekend, so here's last Friday's drivel.

https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A% ... uates.html

Norman Tebbit and sneering at students. Ozzy Osborne and the Littlejohn he knew. Gay slurs about Mandelson. Sneering at reporters for asking questions. Lazy, unmitigated dross.

Norman Tebbit, pictured with Margaret Thatcher in 1987, embodied a lost England, where hard work and self-sufficiency were valued and reliance on the State was a source of shame, not a lifestyle choice, writes Richard Littlejohn

Instant gratification, government incentives to get rich quick from property asset inflation, vulgar ostentatious consumerism on the never never, 'real jobs' lost in their millions, flog off what you can to cook the books. So no I don't recall Thatcher's Britain was Mr Micawber land, Dickie.