Page 88 of 152
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 7:00 am
by soulboy
The attack dogs have been released, going all in on the Savile smears.
After Labour's dishonest ads attacking Rishi Sunak on soft justice, case files prove it's Starmer who should be in the dock over law and order
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -dock.html
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 7:26 am
by Andy McDandy
Half of which are Yewtree related, and are "person we like got charged", and several others are "case dropped as new evidence emerged". Very weak stuff.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:06 am
by Youngian
Performing a Dan Hodges tribute act is such a low bar you can call Barry Gardiner as a witness
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:08 am
by Abernathy
“Dehumanising” the Tories? They’d have to be even slightly human for that to be even possible.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:26 am
by Youngian
I like what Barry’s saying but there’s little evidence it’s true. Especially from Corbyn’s era despite his best efforts to stick to the issues. You’re guaranteed a massive applause on QT for calling for an end to mud slinging and concentrate on policies that matter to people. That’s because people are full of shit.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:36 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Gardiner is, and always has been a tosser.
We need to crush these bastards and you won't do that with soft words and side-eye.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 6:59 am
by Andy McDandy
Youngian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:26 am
I like what Barry’s saying but there’s little evidence it’s true. Especially from Corbyn’s era despite his best efforts to stick to the issues. You’re guaranteed a massive applause on QT for calling for an end to mud slinging and concentrate on policies that matter to people. That’s because people are full of shit.
That's the same QT that saw its ratings spike during the expenses scandal, as audience members lined up to tell MPs how full of shit they were, that promoted populists, that embraced the trivial, and never looked back.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 7:28 am
by Youngian
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:36 am
We need to crush these bastards and you won't do that with soft words and side-eye.
And keep doing it when the Tories are in opposition as political memories are very short in some heads. As they would say in Washington; a bulk order of KY jelly is needed for some prolonged ratfucking.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 1:18 pm
by Bones McCoy
Youngian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 7:28 am
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:36 am
We need to crush these bastards and you won't do that with soft words and side-eye.
And keep doing it when the Tories are in opposition as political memories are very short in some heads. As they would say in Washington; a bulk order of KY jelly is needed for some prolonged ratfucking.
Short memories indeed.
You'd think Zahawi never existed if you read the red-tops.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 8:42 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Starmer's pissed off James Whale
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:12 pm
by Bones McCoy
The Weeping Angel wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 8:42 pm
Starmer's pissed off James Whale
Uphill both ways ...
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:21 pm
by Youngian
War on woke boilers
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:05 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I see one of our number has already spotted this chap BTL, one of my least favourite online leftists.
Rich people of course all live in drafty old houses, where they've never had insulation done. I'll take a wild guess that the few people living in baronial castles aren't going to get an offer of completely free insulation on the government- it is possible to take distributional effects into consideration. And anyway, don't the Greens support insulation?
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:15 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:05 pm
I see one of our number has already spotted this chap BTL, one of my least favourite online leftists.
Rich people of course all live in drafty old houses, where they've never had insulation done. I'll take a wild guess that the few people living in baronial castles aren't going to get an offer of completely free insulation on the government- it is possible to take distributional effects into consideration. And anyway, don't the Greens support insulation?
Yeah it's actually quite extraordinary that Labour's policy of insulating 4 million homes has been all but been ignored.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:34 pm
by davidjay
People don't want warmer homes and cheaper fuel bills; they want international socialism.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2023 11:16 pm
by mattomac
Apparently the other comment I’ve seen on these small policy announcements is it’s got nothing to do with local councils.
Of course getting every kid to do Maths up to 18 is.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2023 9:48 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Yeah. I saw that one. Someone from the Government will pop up on election night to say how sad it was that national issues "intruded".
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:26 pm
by Crabcakes
This is really disappointing from Starmer on PR. Hope there’s a change of direction - voluntary, but forced by a vote if needed - once in office.
PR is the only way to stop another Tory 10-year block and shift the Overton window in the U.K. back in the direction that better reflects the majority of this country’s real politics rather than the charade of pandering to a right-wing minority because of the absurdities of FPTP.
https://bylinetimes.com/2023/04/27/keir ... reformers/
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:46 pm
by Youngian
the charade of pandering to a right-wing minority because of the absurdities of FPTP.
Is the narrative to combat: ‘This loser doesn’t think he can win under the present system so I’m not voting for a loser?’
Any announcement Starmer makes is about crafty tactical advantage so little point in dissecting the content. Don’t see he has any choice under FPTP.
Re: Keir Starmer
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 6:40 pm
by Oboogie
very hard to see how Starmer could back PR if he wants to win the election.