Samanfur wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 8:38 pmQuite a few not very well off people in his constituency in Weymouth and Portland. Doubtless they'd rather have tax cuts, or something.
Richard Drax did not approve.
Samanfur wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 8:38 pmQuite a few not very well off people in his constituency in Weymouth and Portland. Doubtless they'd rather have tax cuts, or something.
Richard Drax did not approve.
mattomac wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 6:41 pm I’ve noticed he isn’t actually that bright is he?Having brushed up with the world of tech financier dudes from Silicon Valley, not a lot goes on outside their wheelhouse. Elon Musk’s birdbrained political pronouncements make Tim Martin look like Peter Hennessy.
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 7:05 pm They know they're right because everyone around them tells them they're right. Those people depend entirely on keeping their minister happy. Hence telling them they're right all the time.Depends on the minister...
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon Jun 20, 2022 12:50 pm Why do I keep seeing Sunak's deputy, the not exactly persuasive Simon Clarke?Sunak is only popular when he isn’t in the news, same goes for all of them really. Maybe that’s what 500k spent on that image focus group told him. I just looked at the polling and the peaks and troughs.
Taking on public sector unions ought be something a Tory Chancellor relishes. Does Rishi only appear when he's handing out free money?
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:16 pm The funny thing is that before, a fair bit of effort was being put into "Rishi" as a brand. Nobody ever did that with Philip Hammond. Why did they do it with Rishi, then apparently change their mind?Probably because that’s what he asked for. He likes the idea of signing stuff and people thinking “ooh, that makes it more prestige!”. Which entirely matches the world he comes from where you flaunt your absurdly priced brand name products to show your wealth.
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:51 am Another "Classic Sunak" assistance scheme.In the 90s me and a mate shared a flat and the electricity was included in the rent but there was a gas meter which we had to top up with pound coins (remarkable this cash method was still in use as recent as 1997). This meant that the gas bill was in the landlord's name and therefore we never saw it, but the gas was obviously paid for directly by us. Under that method he would've got the £400 and it would've been complicated working out how much of it he would've owed us. There are going to be lots of landlords either unscrupulously keeping this £400 or just being deliberately slow in passing it on unfortunately.
£400 energy payment: Fears landlords to keep renters' rebate
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-62375576