Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Well, so much for any confusion over whether she’s more intelligent or not…

Examples of badness include undermining their ministers and agitating. So, you know, doing their jobs and standing up to bullies.

Can’t think why she’d have a problem with that…

Crabcakes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 8:46 pm Well, so much for any confusion over whether she’s more intelligent or not…

I think she IS intelligent. She is also a thoroughly unpleasant gobshite with no filter, a complete lack of self awareness and the classic, obligatory, burning sense of poor-me, right-wing victimhood. She's fucking horrible so it's no surprise at all that the mythical 'Tory members' like the cut of her jib.

Well considering she hacked Harriet Hartman’s computer she would know a bit about being a criminal.

I listened to her performance at PMQs today and she was more amateurish than even expected.

Of course, she won't learn from this, because KweenKemi is never wrong about anything. Her officials will have had an uncomfortable afternoon.

It has been noted that Patel was smug grinning at the start of PMQs, but stony faced by the end.

Starmer’s script gag was also bang on. She’s that arrogant, she thought a former DPP would miss a detail like that.

Famously, Starmer laid traps for Johnson - most notably the “we’ll leave it there for now” relating to lying to the house. With Badenoch, he could probably come out and say “this is a trap, by the way” and she’d still walk into it.

She was bad , Ed Davey up next was Churchill in comparison. He's going to be a bigger thorn in Starmer's side if Trump erects tariffs and divests from NATO.

Badenoch mentioned a trade deal with Trump, that's how clueless she is.

Starmer isn't short of weapons but hopefully if she does this again, he might pull her up on all the "trade deals" she reckons she'd negotiated with American states.

Those memos of understanding are proven to be utterly worthless, but her press corps will paint Labour to be regressing on this.

Labour doesn't have to do anything about them. Think going to be hard for Kemi to give the impression than there's a trade deal with Trump to be done.

By the time the next election comes around Trump will have been and gone. Hopefully the Republican's will be stuffed at the next set of elections after they fail to deliver on their promises.

The Republicans don't intend to go, ever. Therein lies the problem.

satnav wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:27 pm By the time the next election comes around Trump will have been and gone. Hopefully the Republican's will be stuffed at the next set of elections after they fail to deliver on their promises.

What next set of elections?

(Waiting for the Capitol to catch fire...)

Some of Kemi's media mates are taking "give Farage a job" seriously. I wonder if she's going to flirt with it.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:53 am Some of Kemi's media mates are taking "give Farage a job" seriously. I wonder if she's going to flirt with it.

As if the frog-eyed cunt doesn't already have enough "jobs".

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:53 am Some of Kemi's media mates are taking "give Farage a job" seriously. I wonder if she's going to flirt with it.

Think of the Employer's NI we'd raise.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:53 am Some of Kemi's media mates are taking "give Farage a job" seriously. I wonder if she's going to flirt with it.

Without a doubt. Don't be at all surprised if Reform merge with the Tories during this Parliament.

I'd be pretty surprised. And Ed Davey would laugh his socks off.

She’s hyping a US trade deal again, by the look of it. Not just good relations with Trump, but a trade deal.

I can’t see how this withstands the slightest scrutiny of what this would entail.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 5:50 pm I'd be pretty surprised. And Ed Davey would laugh his socks off.

They keep looking over their right shoulder at Reform UK Ltd. That’s fine. The more they do the better.