Page 91 of 105

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:16 pm
by davidjay
The pressure group’s website is now appealing for donations
Bears, woods, popes, Catholic.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:10 pm
by Youngian
davidjay wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:16 pm
The pressure group’s website is now appealing for donations
Bears, woods, popes, Catholic.
What pressure group is this?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:44 pm
by Boiler
Action on World Health. See post viewtopic.php?p=113060#p113060

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... o-us-board
The pressure group’s website is now appealing for donations by payment card or US bank account and has a website form for people from around the world to email their politicians to speak out against the WHO, although it does not include an option for people from the UK to email their politicians.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2026 10:45 pm
by Bones McCoy
Boiler wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:44 pm Action on World Health. See post viewtopic.php?p=113060#p113060

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... o-us-board
The pressure group’s website is now appealing for donations by payment card or US bank account and has a website form for people from around the world to email their politicians to speak out against the WHO, although it does not include an option for people from the UK to email their politicians.
The WHO provides much life saving information, training and resources globally.
The US government has already pulled its support.
If they're sending agents to make extraterritorial attacks (classic USA spook tactics), extra millions will die.

This could be worse than the closure of USaid.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 7:48 am
by Killer Whale
So what is behind this? What is their stated objection to the WHO, and what is their actual, underlying, objection?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 8:43 am
by Boiler
Read for yourself; https://www.actionwh.org/

In a nutshell, it seems to be about funding and, guess what? Immigration.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 8:49 am
by RedSparrows
I think the banner image says a lot...

https://www.actionwh.org/research-priorities

Seems pretty standard:

1) Take an existing supranational body and complain it is not representative. See also: the EU. This is the only part of the proposition that will have some merit.
2) Throw in a desire to remove all shackles on thrusting independent nations of thrusting independent men of thrusting independent colour
3) Pretend climate change and pandemics aren't really international issues
4) ????
5) Profit!

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 8:56 am
by Rosvanian
So it's just another manifestation of the far right's obsessions: victimhood, hate and greed.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 9:06 am
by Boiler
Some people believe that Farage has overplayed his hand in UK politics: questions about donations, houses and the somewhat forgotten issue of phone hacking, coupled with his complete absence from the constituency he is supposed to represent have had people speculating his time as an MP may be over.

Is it likely then that with this new grift - now US-based, where it'd get more traction (and funding) that Farage could be thinking of migrating to the US, or would leaving Blighty be a step too far for him?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 9:09 am
by Yug
For a frog-faced cunt who only cares about the frog-faced cunt, how many shits do you think he actually gives about this green and pleasant land?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 9:29 am
by Boiler
It'd certainly be more pleasant if he fucked off out of it, but he's very much a 'patriot'.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 10:04 am
by Bones McCoy
Classic Tufton Street Astroturf.

This organisation likely runs on a couple of interns and a huge pile of Crypto.
But when enough questions are asked, somebody Nicky Campbell / Laura Kuenssberg will start parroting.

And when the one hour BBC2 "Do we really need the WHO" exposee runs, Nigel will be there, grinning like a Cheshire frog and riling up your grannies.
That money wasted on suppressing Ebola could have provided a copper on a bike in your village
If only those Volvo mechanics had known what they were doing...

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 10:08 am
by Boiler
...or the pilot wasn't as good as he was.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 10:32 am
by Killer Whale
So it's a way for grifters to milk corporate donations? What's in it for the donors?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2026 12:13 pm
by Bones McCoy
Killer Whale wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 10:32 am So it's a way for grifters to milk corporate donations? What's in it for the donors?
Fuggen showed 'em, didn't we Ethel?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 6:12 pm
by Boiler
Keep the pressure on.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... o-lobbying
The Labour MP Phil Brickell, chair of the parliamentary group on anti-corruption and responsible tax, has now reported Farage’s actions to the standards commissioner, asking him to look into the Reform leader’s interactions with the Bank of England.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 6:55 pm
by Watchman
RedSparrows wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 8:49 am I think the banner image says a lot...

https://www.actionwh.org/research-priorities

Seems pretty standard:

1) Take an existing supranational body and complain it is not representative. See also: the EU. This is the only part of the proposition that will have some merit.
2) Throw in a desire to remove all shackles on thrusting independent nations of thrusting independent men of thrusting independent colour
3) Pretend climate change and pandemics aren't really international issues
4) ????
5) Profit!
See also Donnie’s “Board of Peace”

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 7:38 pm
by davidjay
He's looking for a way out, isn't he?

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 8:09 pm
by Abernathy
Farage has only ever been out to enrich himself and make himself a vast pile of cash. He seems to be well on course to do that , with 5 properties paid for in cash, undeclared “no strings” “gifts” of 5 million knicker from Thai-based crypto currency billionaires, and trousering £270,000 for a few hours “work” for a gold bullion dealer.

He probably wanted to do it by way of becoming Prime Minister, but he’ll probably now settle for abandoning that little project. Ideally, like his chum Boris Johnson, he would have wanted to be in a position to monetise a future position as having been a Prime Minister, but he’ll be able to scrape by without that, no doubt. The cunt might even get his fucking Coutts bank account back.

Re: Nargle Fargle

Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:28 pm
by davidjay
When he goes - as seems likely - and Reform duly vanishes - as it will - I wonder how many of them will skulk back to the Tories and how many will move on to Restore. Because the last couple of years have certainly emboldened bigotry and parties that the Not Racist But... faction would never have countenanced previously are now looking more amenable.