Page 96 of 97
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:42 pm
by Samanfur
Boiler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:38 pmQuestion, though: could he still stand if the Standards Committee rule against him, or is he trying to pre-empt them?
Absolutely trying to pre-empt. I don't think that they can touch him if he has a clean break between two terms as an MP and the infraction in the first one, but can anyone confirm that before I go looking for Erskine May's thoughts and come back?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:42 pm
by Abernathy
Interesting - Michael Crick is reminding us of the time that the Tory MP David Davis (remember him?) resigned his seat in Haltemprice & Howden in order to fight it again in a by-election that he said was about freedom of speech or some such bollocks. The other parties dismissed it as a facile stunt and I think mostly even declined to stand candidates, and Davis won the by-election easily, so it meant nothing and was a total waste of everybody’s time.
This might well happen again in Clacton. Fargle is taking quite a risk. He clearly anticipates that he was going to face a by-election anyway as a result of the standards investigation , and is gambling on jumping the gun and trying to frame it as a Fargle vs The Establishment crusade.
Bizarre.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
by Watchman
If he gets back in, he’ll think he’s exonerated….er, No! If he looses it will be the “Establishment” ganged up on me, and now I’m off to Merika.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
David Miliband isn’t going to get selected, or win. It needs a blue collar version of Martin Bell.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
by RedSparrows
Does he even remember where Clacton is?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Does this resignation stop the investigation? Or can it restart if he comes back?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:44 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
What’s the advantage of resigning now and playing the cards he could have played anyway?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:45 pm
by Samanfur
David Miliband isn't going to give up the private sector for an MP's salary and workload again, you mean.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:45 pm
by Crabcakes
My friend who is a parliamentary expert thinks Farage may have misread or misunderstood the code. The investigation will be suspended but will resume should he be re-elected.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:47 pm
by Samanfur
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:44 pm
What’s the advantage of resigning now and playing the cards he could have played anyway?
If he's re-elected, he Parliamentary Standards Committee can't touch him for anything that happened before he resigned.
EDIT: Cheers for the clarification, Crabcakes.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:50 pm
by Samanfur
Apparently, he's under another investigation for undeclared gifts, as well.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:51 pm
by soulboy
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
David Miliband isn’t going to get selected, or win. It needs a blue collar version of Martin Bell.
Danny Dyer? The hustings would be dynamite.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:52 pm
by Boiler
They'd be very sweary....

Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:53 pm
by Samanfur
Danny "Just cut her face so nobody will want her" Dyer?
He might have reinvented himself as a family man, but I don't doubt that journalists remember that quote, and would have a few more things that they were sitting on.
Of course, it'd probably make him more popular with a few of the knuckle-draggers.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:06 pm
by soulboy
Urgh.
I had indeed forgotten that in my desire to hear the equivalent of his "trotters up" rant.
Utterly reprehensible.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:11 pm
by Oboogie
soulboy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:51 pm
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
David Miliband isn’t going to get selected, or win. It needs a blue collar version of Martin Bell.
Danny Dyer? The hustings would be dynamite.
Somebody of that ilk, working class, non-politician, standing as an independent.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:15 pm
by Oboogie
Crabcakes wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:45 pm
My friend who is a parliamentary expert thinks Farage may have misread or misunderstood the code. The investigation will be suspended but will resume should he be re-elected.
You'd think he'd be able to afford someone clever to check it for him...but that underestimates his arrogance I suppose.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:19 pm
by Samanfur
In Farage's narrative, "clever" is an insult.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:29 pm
by davidjay
Oboogie wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:11 pm
soulboy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:51 pm
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:43 pm
David Miliband isn’t going to get selected, or win. It needs a blue collar version of Martin Bell.
Danny Dyer? The hustings would be dynamite.
Somebody of that ilk, working class, non-politician, standing as an independent.
Stephen Yaxley-Lennon?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:55 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Crabcakes wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2026 2:45 pm
My friend who is a parliamentary expert thinks Farage may have misread or misunderstood the code. The investigation will be suspended but will resume should he be re-elected.
Now then!