Page 97 of 152

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2023 8:45 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Outlier, most likely. But I like it.


Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2023 5:12 pm
by Youngian
‘Starmer changes his shirt.’ I’m at a loss as to what this slur is about

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2023 5:54 pm
by Andy McDandy
Because it's still quite hot in a lot of places, and if you're crammed into public transport or a packed media room (with the cameras and lights adding their own heat), you'll be sweating like a 70s DJ hearing hard knocking on the front door early in the morning.

So rather than be dubbed as "sweaty starmpits" or something by twats, maybe carry some changes of clothing? Or have we got to the stage where two shirts is the surefire giveaway sign of the urban intelligentsia elite?

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2023 7:14 pm
by soulboy
A black shirt? Clearly pandering to the Daily Mail who are quite the fans of that look.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2023 10:45 pm
by mattomac
There is a level of desperation not yet reached I feel.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2023 7:09 am
by Youngian
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 5:54 pm Or have we got to the stage where two shirts is the surefire giveaway sign of the urban intelligentsia elite?
Yes

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2023 11:22 pm
by The Weeping Angel

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2023 11:33 pm
by Abernathy
And your point is, caller?

Let’s just remember that Tony Blair did someting similar before Labour’s landslide victory of 1997, entirely understandably to draw the fangs of the hitherto deadly Murdoch media serpent in order that The Sun et al, would not torpedo Labour’s still uncertain (not over till the votes are counted) passage back to government. Starmer would appear to have learned a lesson from this and is engaged on something similar.

Cue apoplexy from the Trots, etc. But fuck them.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 2:03 pm
by davidjay
Abernathy wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2023 11:33 pm And your point is, caller?

Let’s just remember that Tony Blair did someting similar before Labour’s landslide victory of 1997, entirely understandably to draw the fangs of the hitherto deadly Murdoch media serpent in order that The Sun et al, would not torpedo Labour’s still uncertain (not over till the votes are counted) passage back to government. Starmer would appear to have learned a lesson from this and is engaged on something similar.

Cue apopley from the Trots, etc. But fuck them.
For people obsessed with politics they don't know much about politics.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 3:05 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
That was obvious when they took over our CLP.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 3:14 pm
by Andy McDandy
They know what they want it to be. Bit like Sun readers and Shakespeare.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 4:28 pm
by The Weeping Angel
First there was beergate



Now it's Ice Cream gate

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 5:14 pm
by Andy McDandy
Funny fuckers, aren't they?

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 5:20 pm
by Spoonman
These days he might have 99 problems but an ice cream ain't one.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 7:21 pm
by Yug
The Grauniad's report on the criminal ice creams:

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ch-riviera

Why the hell are they wasting space on this total non-story?

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:32 pm
by Youngian
Was he running donkey rides as well?

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:59 pm
by davidjay
Yug wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2023 7:21 pm The Grauniad's report on the criminal ice creams:

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ch-riviera

Why the hell are they wasting space on this total non-story?
I would guess he's let it go out as a bit of a "Look, he's human after all" story. The only people to take it seriously will be the Jezzerati.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 4:18 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
It's official. Sir Keir doesn't get everything right, but my money was always on him here.

I see that (and you'll be amazed to hear this) civil servants aren't expected to resign their jobs before trying to find a new one.


Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 4:30 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Hilariously, it seems the government are still going for this. WMA is Written Ministerial Answer. "Prima facie" is as good as saying "we've got nothing, but..."

If there's a winning issue for the government it's "we insist on the highest standard of abiding by rules".


Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 4:36 pm
by Boiler
Seems you can't read Twitter now unless you have an account.