Page 97 of 97

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 1:04 pm
by Boiler
Guardian (US) analysis of the gaslighting by this despicable regime;

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ce-killing

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 1:11 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Well at least we know what to do next time some tooled up Trumpers occupy a piece of land in Oregon. Bang bang self-defence.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 1:40 pm
by Andy McDandy
It's the South Park "Jesus Christ, it's coming right at us!" defence.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 3:43 pm
by Spoonman
He may be on paper at least the most powerful politician on the planet, but it just takes someone else to get lucky to chop him down in a split second, especially given 'murica's record with assisinated presidents.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 3:50 pm
by soulboy
Mail Online's current top story.

New video shows ICE shooting victim Renee Nicole Good block road for FOUR MINUTES before she was shot so wife could leap out of car to begin filming

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... polis.html

Stopping motorists? Four, sorry FOUR, whole minutes? I guess she got what she deserved :roll:

Interesting use of language here, by the Mail's Senior US Reporter.
There is speculation that Rebecca Good, who admitted to bringing her spouse to the anti-ICE protest, exited the car so she could begin filming any potential clash with federal agents. She was seen wielding her camera during Ross's confrontation with her wife but it is unclear when she first started tor record.
Not holding up her phone, wielding. It looks like the Mail has picked a side.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 4:04 pm
by Boiler
Of course it has - the US is a big market for it.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 6:29 pm
by Rosvanian
It was never in doubt. The Mail has the same moral code as the orange one.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 6:32 pm
by kreuzberger
"Yee-Haw for the Blackshirts"

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 6:44 pm
by soulboy
A black Fred Perry shirt with yellow collar trim and yellow laurel wreathes?

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 7:50 pm
by Oboogie
This is apparently real and, if so, it might make a difference to some.


Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:00 pm
by Boiler
I made the mistake of putting on Any Questions on the car's radio on my way home.

I found myself listening to some journo called Gerard Baker and - well, listen for yourself.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:16 pm
by Abernathy
Was that video taken by the ICE agent? Isn’t it a bit self-incriminating ?

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:52 pm
by kreuzberger
These people are officially criminally insane. The believe/eyes/deny quote from Orwell was not an instruction manual, rather evidence by which they will eventually be judged.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 10:14 pm
by Oboogie
Abernathy wrote: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:16 pm Was that video taken by the ICE agent? Isn’t it a bit self-incriminating ?
You, I and anyone sane thinks it's self-incriminating, J.D.Vance has Tweeted it as definitive proof that Ms Good was a domestic terrorist who did run over the ICE agent. He said the Left-wing media won't dare to show it.


Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 10:30 pm
by RedSparrows
Oboogie wrote: Fri Jan 09, 2026 10:14 pm
Abernathy wrote: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:16 pm Was that video taken by the ICE agent? Isn’t it a bit self-incriminating ?
You, I and anyone sane thinks it's self-incriminating, J.D.Vance has Tweeted it as definitive proof that Ms Good was a domestic terrorist who did run over the ICE agent. He said the Left-wing media won't dare to show it.

I'm sorry J D, is this a piece of your brain?

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 11:32 pm
by Bones McCoy
Spacehopper faced cunt.

Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2026 11:58 am
by Boiler
I do feel for Victoria Derbyshire here...




I don't understand how the description of the clip doesn't match its content though?