Oboogie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 29, 2026 10:06 am
"Bruce Springsteen, TERRIBLE MUSICIAN. A FAILED songwriter, NEVER had a hit, the most unpopular singer EVER, even though NOBODY'S ever even heard of him. It's a FACT, nobody likes him. LOSER."
Prefers Kid Rock.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2026 9:29 pm
by Bones McCoy
Songs: Another here for the big beautiful day.
For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast,
And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed;
And the eyes of the sleepers waxed deadly and chill,
And their hearts but once heaved, and for ever grew still!
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2026 9:33 pm
by Oboogie
Further to my previous post...
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:31 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 29, 2026 9:29 pm
Songs: Another here for the big beautiful day.
For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast,
And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed;
And the eyes of the sleepers waxed deadly and chill,
And their hearts but once heaved, and for ever grew still!
He ain't no Sennacherib, bruv.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 8:06 am
by Youngian
Oboogie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 29, 2026 10:06 am
"Bruce Springsteen, TERRIBLE MUSICIAN. A FAILED songwriter, NEVER had a hit, the most unpopular singer EVER, even though NOBODY'S ever even heard of him. It's a FACT, nobody likes him. LOSER."
So close
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 8:17 am
by Yug
So overrated he's the first "rocker" to reach a personal worth of $1 billion.
Unlike Trump, Springsteen made his money by sheer bloody hard work and being popular.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 8:21 am
by Killer Whale
If and when Trump is gone, a serious sovereign state would be taking a long hard look at the monarchical powers available to a President acting in bad faith.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 9:57 am
by kreuzberger
I preferred Oboogie's original.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 9:59 am
by Boiler
Youngian wrote: ↑Fri Jan 30, 2026 8:06 am
So close
Again - are we sure that's real? I've just scrolled through four days of its excretions on Truth Social and can't find it.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 10:43 am
by Tubby Isaacs
Now sueing the IRS for $10bn for his tax return being leaked.
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 29, 2026 9:29 pm
Songs: Another here for the big beautiful day.
For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast,
And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed;
And the eyes of the sleepers waxed deadly and chill,
And their hearts but once heaved, and for ever grew still!
He ain't no Sennacherib, bruv.
Loves a bit of purple and gold; especially the gold.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 10:53 am
by Bones McCoy
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Fri Jan 30, 2026 9:57 am
I preferred Oboogie's original.
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Fri Jan 30, 2026 9:57 am
I preferred Oboogie's original.
Maybe 47 needs a new speechwriter.
Sadly Lord Byron is no longer available.
Lord Byron's got nothing on me, I've been told I'm nearly as good as AI, I bet nobody ever said that about that loser.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:17 pm
by Abernathy
You mean the OVER-RATED Lord Byron ?
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:21 pm
by Oboogie
Abernathy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:17 pm
You mean the OVER-RATED Lord Byron ?
Totally, I looked it up, not one record in the Billboard Top 100.
Re: Trump 2.0 Lunacy
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:23 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I wonder if someone's had a word. The nomination for Fed Chair is someone, naturally, massively connected to wealth who's stuck it to the current Fed. But equally he has a background in central banking. So markets will be happier than they might have been.
He's regarded as a fiscal hawk though. Is that what Trump has in mind? I thought he wanted cheaper credit and a weaker dollar. Or perhaps he's a Republican fiscal hawk- ie he only means it when Democrats are in power. We'll see, I guess.