Page 135 of 135

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 2:43 pm
by Andy McDandy
Seen on Facebook (because I wrote it) regarding Zia:
He's not even Shabna Mahmood's Chris Philp; he's Chris Philp's Chris Philp.

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 3:01 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Weeping Angel wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:08 pm It's being blamed for an increase in youth unemployment.
Yeah, this is the stronger argument against it, at the lower age anyway. I thought that seemed a rather rash promise like the "day one" rights. I'd be OK with the rise in the lower ages being phased in.

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 3:11 pm
by Andy McDandy
I seem to remember quite a lot of youth unemployment prior to 1997.

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 3:33 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Some zingers here from Danny Kruger. He's against no fault divorces, which I recall being a talking point for people who thought John Major was a liberal socialist. Is there any evidence this stuff appeals to Reform voters?

Farage isn't exactly Mr Family Man, then again nor is Trump and his party get away with pushing this stuff.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... al-economy

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 3:49 pm
by Andy McDandy
Kruger denied that Reform UK was a divisive party, and he suggested there could be widespread anger if the party did not win the next election.

“The total opposite is the case. The only chance of unity for our country is Reform. If we don’t win, or if we win and then make a mess of it, I do fear for our country,” he said.
Vote for us or the country gets it.

Got it, alright.

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 5:03 pm
by Youngian
How many Reform voters believe there's not enough people?
So Kruger wants to throw taxpayer money at policies that have failed in every country to reverse declining birthrates.
Kruger said Reform UK had a “pronatalist ambition” and would seek policies to encourage people to have more children, including exploring changes to the tax system to make payments based on households rather than individuals.

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 6:32 pm
by mattomac
Andy McDandy wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 3:49 pm
Kruger denied that Reform UK was a divisive party, and he suggested there could be widespread anger if the party did not win the next election.

“The total opposite is the case. The only chance of unity for our country is Reform. If we don’t win, or if we win and then make a mess of it, I do fear for our country,” he said.
Vote for us or the country gets it.

Got it, alright.
Wasn’t that also the message from a certain Austrian painter?

If he said if we win and make a mess of it fair enough we need to be held accountable but his view seems be solidly it’s them and them regardless.

The fact is the country is ok, its trading position is improving. There is faults but nothing any single policy from this lot will solve.

Re: Reform Party

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 6:56 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Tue Feb 24, 2026 3:49 pm
Kruger denied that Reform UK was a divisive party, and he suggested there could be widespread anger if the party did not win the next election.

“The total opposite is the case. The only chance of unity for our country is Reform. If we don’t win, or if we win and then make a mess of it, I do fear for our country,” he said.
Vote for us or the country gets it.

Got it, alright.
Time for somebody to remind him he's not back on the high Veldt.