Page 151 of 151

Re: Labour Government 2024 - ?

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2025 9:40 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Continuity Tories latest.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz9k12w5j54o
Parents who experience a miscarriage before 24 weeks of pregnancy will be entitled to bereavement leave under a planned law change.

The government is set to amend the Employment Rights Bill to give parents the legal right to take time off work to grieve if they experience pregnancy loss at any stage.

As it stands, bereavement leave is only available to parents who lose an unborn child after 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said the change will give "people time away from work to grieve".

"No one who is going through the heartbreak of pregnancy loss should have to go back to work before they are ready," Rayner said.

Parents are currently entitled, external to a fortnight's leave if they suffer pregnancy loss after 24 weeks, or if a child younger than 18 dies.

They can also be eligible for two weeks' statutory parental bereavement pay - either £187.18 a week or 90% of average weekly earnings, whichever is the lower - if they have been working for their employer for at least 26 weeks.

The proposed extended right to leave would be unpaid and last for at least one week, though the exact length is still being consulted on.

Further details - including who will be eligible and whether a doctor's note would be required - will also be decided following a consultation.

The measure would apply in England, Scotland and Wales, but not Northern Ireland.

The Employment Rights Bill, which includes further measures to protect in law the right of employees to have time off to grieve the loss of a loved one, is already making its way through Parliament.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/ju ... re_btn_url

Bosses in the UK will be banned from using non-disclosure agreements to silence employees who have suffered harassment and discrimination in the workplace as part of the government’s overhaul of workers’ rights.

Ministers will on Monday night table amendments to the government’s employment rights bill to prohibit the widespread practice of using legally enforceable NDAs to conceal unacceptable behaviour at work.

If passed, the rules would mean any future confidentiality clauses in settlement agreements that sought to prevent a worker speaking about an allegation of harassment – including sexual harassment – or discrimination would be null and void.

They would also allow victims to speak freely about their experiences, while any witnesses – including employers – would be able to call out poor conduct and publicly support victims without the threat of being sued.

Re: Labour Government 2024 - ?

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 12:07 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Jul 08, 2025 11:46 am John Crace is the sketch writer, so shouldn't be taken seriously. It's the other coverage that annoys me, no sense of trade offs at all. Just "here's a single issuecampaigning group saying Labour are shitty bastards" and "here's a comment article saying they're shitty bastards".

Here's more. Government inherited a completely shitty situation with the courts. Government tries to sort it out.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... ers-courts
Removing the right to a jury trial for more offences would disadvantage people of colour and other minorities and lead to more miscarriages of justice, reformers have warned.
One way of looking at the current system is that it's avoiding miscarriages of justice. Sadly, not be being fair and efficient, but by sticking the cases on an apparently indefinite waiting list. All those cases have victims- very many of them from ethnic minorities. Surely actually getting those trials done has to be the priority?

In fairness, one of the campaign groups quoted does recognize the trade offs, and suggests the (likely) government proposals are OK if they're temporary. That might be a way forward, though like anything, temporary will come to mean indefinitely.
Secret Barrister says it's the fault of the govt because they didn't let Leveson recommend increase funding.

Re: Labour Government 2024 - ?

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2025 1:37 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I saw that. I wonder if Brian, knowing of the furorerory that will come about because of, viz, reduction of jury trials is just gaming the game and pushing a push for increased funding?

"Well, if that's what you want, these will be the consequences - how d'ya like them lemons, eh?'