Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Youngian wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:23 am Starmer’s Trump grovelling has gone well beyond the call of duty.

Give your head a wobble.

Charlie Kirk didn’t get what he deserved, because no one deserves that sort of horrific death. He did, however, get what he openly thought other people deserved. So his death and the manner of it should be no more than a stark reminder that his aims and goals in life were abhorrent - and that his life and work should in no way celebrated or sanitised simply because of the manner of its ending. And those such as Johnson who stood up and applauded what he said others should be subject to, but are horrified by his killing, are at absolute best hypocrites of the most obnoxious nature.

My sympathy extends no further than to his family.

Quite. It is possible to condemn political assassination and express condolences to the bereaved without endorsing the views and statements of the victim.

And on that note:

See also: