I’m starting to wonder if handing over legal human rights protections to these guys in government is such a good idea.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2024 1:35 pm
by satnav
I predicted when Reform won a handful of seats that their MP's would do very little work in parliament but instead would look to grab headlines by making controversial statements. Farage posted some rubbish about events in Leeds last week and Tice and Anderson have both piped up about events at Manchester airport. It is going to be a long 5 years.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:21 am
by Youngian
What I did in my holidays by Lee aged 13 and three quarters.
Jim Davidson can be a funny stand up with a family audience but Jethro!
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:22 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Bunch of cunts.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:27 am
by Crabcakes
So in conclusion, he could go where he wanted and listen to people say whatever they wanted, in public, to a large audience.
So where exactly are these free speech issues and no go areas he keeps whining about?
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:37 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Crabcakes wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:27 am
So in conclusion, he could go where he wanted and listen to people say whatever they wanted, in public, to a large audience.
So where exactly are these free speech issues and no go areas he keeps whining about?
Londonistan, with that Jihadist 'mayor'.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:54 am
by Youngian
He gets even dafter
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:56 am
by Killer Whale
Yes. Yes I can.
The offence is only going on in your head.
You cunt.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 12:01 pm
by Crabcakes
Is he after Littlejohn’s job?
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 12:03 pm
by Youngian
Lee probably considered including Love thy Neighbour but decided to dog whistle what he really means.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 12:13 pm
by Watchman
Youngian wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:21 am
What I did in my holidays by Lee aged 13 and three quarters.
Jim Davidson can be a funny stand up with a family audience but Jethro!
4 middle aged men “having fun” in a fairground!
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 12:24 pm
by Crabcakes
Youngian wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2024 12:03 pm
Lee probably considered including Love thy Neighbour but decided to dog whistle what he really means.
Lee is also almost certainly one of those people who thought Alf Garnett was hilarious without realising you’re supposed to laugh at him, not with him.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:19 pm
by Andy McDandy
Must be awful for your far right comedy lover, sitting with gritted teeth and forcing themselves to laugh through endless reels of crap 70s shitcoms and tired stand-up routines.
It's only partly due to their values dissonance that they don't get rerun. The other major factor is that they were crap.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 2:20 pm
by Bones McCoy
Youngian wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:21 am
What I did in my holidays by Lee aged 13 and three quarters.
Jim Davidson can be a funny stand up with a family audience but Jethro!
A major factor in continued cracking of Enigma (Yes it's another McCoy old war story).
So many brainwashed nazi automata signed off every message with heil Hitler.
Parodied beautifully here:
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 2:22 pm
by Abernathy
Dunno, though. Steptoe & Son, Porridge, and Rising Damp were all brilliant TV sitcoms. The cinema versions of those, which are what 30p seems to be citing, were all shite. Carry On Cowboy was a bit shit too - not a patch on Up the Khyber, Screaming, and Cleo.
Anderson is simply trotting out the tired old "When people were able to have a laugh without getting offended/ Would never get made today because snowflakes" bollocks. Which really is, total, utter bollocks.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 3:00 pm
by Andy McDandy
On a related score, I learned today that All in the Family (the American remake of Till Death...), when originally aired, carried a message before the titles telling audiences that they were going to hear some racial and sexual insults, and be subjected to some pretty blunt opinions they may or may not agree with.
In other words, a trigger warning, in the early 1970s.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 3:36 pm
by Rosvanian
30p seems to have forgotten about On the Buses, the film version of which I chanced upon a few weeks ago. I remember seeing it a a young teenager 50 years ago. Staggeringly shit really doesn't do it justice but if 30p and his pals like it, good luck to them. I pity the fool as another TV character used to say.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 3:58 pm
by Abernathy
Rosvanian wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2024 3:36 pm
30p seems to have forgotten about On the Buses, the film version of which I chanced upon a few weeks ago. I remember seeing it a a young teenager 50 years ago. Staggeringly shit really doesn't do it justice but if 30p and his pals like it, good luck to them. I pity the fool as another TV character used to say.
Yes. On the Buses required stretching the principle of the willing suspension of disbelief to snapping point. At the time, Reg Varney (Stan, the bus driver and main character) was about 53, and looked even older. His mate Jack, the bus conductor, played by Bob Grant, was actually nightmarishly ugly, with a face like that of a shrivelled ferret and an overbite that would have enabled him to eat a Granny Smith through a tennis racket. Yet these two “Jack the Lads” were supposedly having to beat the “dolly birds” off with a shitty stick every week.
30p would love it. For some reason, stuff like this and Love Thy Neighbour are favourites of hateful simpletons like Anderson everywhere.
Re: Lee Anderson
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 5:05 pm
by Youngian
Stephen Lewis always joined the Labour election campaign trail.