Re: The Greens
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2026 1:11 am
Youngian wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 8:11 pmDoes that argument stand up? There will be a relatively small number of people who gamble only or mainly on dogs in England, but It's nowhere in terms of the big gambling sports. As David says, the social harm is going to overwhelmingly from the bigger sports (especially football and racing), and problem gamblers won't gamble any less because they can't bet on the 1.03 at Sittingbourne any more.
The argument Zarb-Cousins is advancing is that the gambling lobby is an extremely lucrative one able to excert weighty pressure on legislators. To continue an activity opponents regard as cruel to animals.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 8:00 pm Yeah, the article cunningly elides animal welfare and gambling. Football and horse racing are miles ahead of the rest. Greyhound racing is behind golf.I have absolutely no idea what that means. For which I am eternally thankful.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 4:52 pm Ah, the old "I'd support those houses if they were council houses" approach. Not those solar panels there. In fairness, all parties tend to be nimby when it's something big near them, but they're not posing as the only people who get climate change.My own MP wasn't very complimentary about her.
In other news, Zack's comic does another "Isn't Hannah Spencer lovely and cool?"
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... hounds-ban
Green MP: Labour caricatures working-class people over greyhound racingI couldn't care less if greyhound racing is banned. I think it probably will be in the not too distant future. But I'm struggling to find a quote of Labour "saying working class people don't care about dogs". I've certainly seen people speculate that Labour think it would lose them votes to ban it, but that's not the same thing. Quotes in the article from Nandy point out, quite accurately, that it's a popular sport, and big industry. Governments don't tend to rush to ban these things.
Hannah Spencer says minister ‘continuously offends people by saying working-class people don’t care about dogs’
Just in case you don't think Labour are the baddies here, the article points out.
Labour has close ties to the gambling industry, taking hundreds of thousands of pound in donations during the general election campaign. Senior figures have been invited to glitzy events held by betting lobbyists.Alas no space to point out that the Budget raised an extra billion of tax off gambling.
I like that she rehomed greyhounds, but she's already shown herself to be a self-righteous bullshitter, who as far as I know hasn't engaged with people who pointed out that subsidizing high energy users in a rich country will mean people in poor countries can't even cook.
And look who else has shown up? I admire his gambling work, but he's not an academic expert or anything, and he hates Labour because they chucked Jez out.
Matt Zarb-Cousin, a co-founder of Gamban, an app that helps people with gambling addictions, said: “The gambling lobby in Westminster has had successive governments believing they somehow speak for the working class while their sector exploits and extracts from it. To make the assumption ordinary working people somehow don’t care about the welfare of dogs is a form of class prejudice.Again, why do you have to be "class-prejudiced" because you won't ban a popular sport? This stuff is such guff.
We might reasonably ask, what's Hannah Spencer's policy on gambling? She wouldn't accept gambling hospitality (not that it did all that much good for the providers in terms of Labour raising extra tax), but what would she actually do?
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2026 10:57 amPerhaps Mark likes these lovely dogsYoungian wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 8:11 pmDoes that argument stand up? There will be a relatively small number of people who gamble only or mainly on dogs in England, but It's nowhere in terms of the big gambling sports.
The argument Zarb-Cousins is advancing is that the gambling lobby is an extremely lucrative one able to excert weighty pressure on legislators. To continue an activity opponents regard as cruel to animals.
Youngian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2026 5:15 pmRight, but you don't have to suppose gambling interests stop the Government from banning greyhound racing or anything. It's a fairly popular sport, though clearly much less than it was. Gambling interests could replace that income reasonably easily.
Perhaps Mark likes these lovely dogs
Oboogie wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2026 5:26 pm Tony Greenstein has been suspended by the Green Party. Reasons for his suspension are his terror charges and the fact that he's a notorious antisemite.Unfortunately, the Greens aren't learning fast enough. And it goes all the way to the Deputy Leader.
Sources in the Green Party telling us he will be expelled. Greenstein's letter protesting suspension is below
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 5:04 pm And Scotland, but there were no tracks there, and only 1 in Wales. There are 20 in England, which may explain why it hasn't followed Scotland and Wales.There's one in NI @ Drumbo, just outside of Lisburn. Been there once - it "groundshares" with Lisburn Distillery F.C. with the soccer pitch in the middle of the track. At one end is the stand & clubhouse of the football club, while at the other is the stand & facilities of the greyhound end. Both can't be open at the same time apparently!
Zack Polanski plots review to junk Greens’ unpopular policieshttps://www.politico.eu/article/boss-br ... -policies/
Youngian wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2026 5:10 pm Not just a Midland thing, the speedway fortunes of the Mildenhall Fen Tigers and Ipswich Witches often made the regional news.I like to think of myself as fairly knowledgeable on towns and sports, but I'd barely heard of Mildenhall, and had no idea it had a Speedway team at any point.
Ice Hockey had a following after WW2 and remember its popularity lingering in Peterborough and Nottingham in the 80s.