Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 3:46 pm He's an ex police inspector. Labour probably thought they had another Dan Jarvis (background few Labour MPs have, but perfectly mainstream). They've got another Eric Adams.

Man's a cunt.

I suppose it makes a change from his obsession with rats.

Youngian wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 3:38 pm Emigration can be as high as a million some years so we can easily process backlogged asylum applicants making up less than 10 percent of the Ins.
Will that satisfy the voters Mr Hinder has in mind?

What's this obsession with them being shacked up in grubby hotels for an undefined period as some cushy number? Sounds fucking awful.

It is, and if they're not in closely-supervised hotels, which are usually away from other residential buildings, where does he propose they live?

davidjay wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 5:56 pm

Youngian wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 3:38 pm Emigration can be as high as a million some years so we can easily process backlogged asylum applicants making up less than 10 percent of the Ins.
Will that satisfy the voters Mr Hinder has in mind?

What's this obsession with them being shacked up in grubby hotels for an undefined period as some cushy number? Sounds fucking awful.

It is, and if they're not in closely-supervised hotels, which are usually away from other residential buildings, where does he propose they live?

Tents?

Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 5:59 pm

davidjay wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 5:56 pm

Youngian wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 3:38 pm Emigration can be as high as a million some years so we can easily process backlogged asylum applicants making up less than 10 percent of the Ins.
Will that satisfy the voters Mr Hinder has in mind?

What's this obsession with them being shacked up in grubby hotels for an undefined period as some cushy number? Sounds fucking awful.

It is, and if they're not in closely-supervised hotels, which are usually away from other residential buildings, where does he propose they live?

Tents?

Luxury. But on a serious note, that's just what many would suggest.

It's already been suggested by Reform - Andrea Jenkunt.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 5:34 pm I'm about to have plant based food for my tea. The "chicken" is fine, struggle a bit with the burger substitute at the moment.

Found a yummy veggie burger in Morrisons but some are awful. Heard the McD ones are good. Was originally just going to abstain from fatty red meat but lean meat is no better at soaking up flavour than plant based proteins. Washing up has become significantly easier as well without dripping fat everywhere.

davidjay wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 5:56 pm

Youngian wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 3:38 pm Emigration can be as high as a million some years so we can easily process backlogged asylum applicants making up less than 10 percent of the Ins.
Will that satisfy the voters Mr Hinder has in mind?

What's this obsession with them being shacked up in grubby hotels for an undefined period as some cushy number? Sounds fucking awful.

It is, and if they're not in closely-supervised hotels, which are usually away from other residential buildings, where does he propose they live?

Rwanda?

Again, it is their pig-ignorant fuckwittery that underpins and reinforces everything that they believe. Doubtless, they hear the word "hotel" and think "posh". These are perceived levels way above their everyday lives (juicing up the resentment), and they jealously imagine all-you-can-eat buffets with entertainers and a bouncy castle for the kids.

Famously posh hotels are all trying to move into the asylum seeker business.

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 7:46 pm Famously posh hotels are all trying to move into the asylum seeker business.

Aye, sure they all are. Does the Savoy send a delegation to Dover with a welcoming kedgeree breakfast and a Verve Cliquot stiffener to take the edge off last night?

It's curious that somewhere deep down there's still the tacit link of 'hotel' and 'fancy'.

Everyone has stayed in a place called a hotel and either left the same night or demanded a refund.

I once stayed in the Novotel in Gateshead, and the Wetherspoons in Birmingham...

I have to travel reasonably regularly for work. We have a policy of always using the cheapest possible chain hotel. They are shit, with TraveLodge almost unbearable, but I don't mind too much because I'm concentrating on work and it's only a couple of nights.
Some people have to live in these awful places for months on end.
And still they're too good in the opinion of some spiteful cunts.
Cunts.

Killer Whale wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 10:29 pm I have to travel reasonably regularly for work. We have a policy of always using the cheapest possible chain hotel. They are shit, with TraveLodge almost unbearable, but I don't mind too much because I'm concentrating on work and it's only a couple of nights.
Some people have to live in these awful places for months on end.
And still they're too good in the opinion of some spiteful cunts.
Cunts.

Travelodge are perfectly fine if all you want is a bed, a shower and somewhere to hang your clothes for a night or two. Few have any sort of communal rooms or facilities better than a vending machine, yet we expect whole families to live semi-permanently in them.