Mailwatch(ed) Forum

The thought occurs: is all this Trump stuff, also an underhand attempt to bring in some "ground rules", to pre-empt the Epstein dam finally breaking.

Do these "Epstein Files" even exist? Like that mythical video tape?

Or are they a dream caused by eating too much blue cheese before bedtime?

Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Tue Nov 11, 2025 11:29 am A man has a take. As someone BTL says, this is like saying "fantastic, the Tories are disappearing".

These shortcomings are not the reasons for the attack on the BBC but what they dont do enough of. Which is intense scrutiny of demagogues used to basking in the applause of their supporters rather than being challenge. Its not just the BBC in the sights of the far right but all reputable news gathering organisations. Witness Farage yesterday getting techy at a Sky reporter questioning his friend of the worker credentials.

To use an analogy, if someone's trying to crash your house party, letting them in won't turn them into the perfect guest. They'll just use your phone to call their mates round to wreck the place because the soft cunt won't fight back.

Maybe the BBC could stop reporting on Trump, no one would miss the news items about whatever written shite hes written that day on truth social.

FFS. "Prorogation" wasn't a coup. The Government won the case in the lower courts.

Apologies for reminding everyone of the existence of Liz. Here she is with that straight talking common sense which today's young people, with their media studies degrees, don't have. "It's in the Telegraph!"

Heavyweight jurist pronounces, invoking the timeless legal principle that the side he dislikes automatically loses.

Christ, these fucking people. These terrible fucking people.

Who let the cunts out - who who!